A recent InSight report revealed that three of the ELN’s five main fighting divisions operate from Venezuelan territory, using it for logistics, training and cross-border movement

Colombia’s National Liberation Army (ELN) and dissident factions of the former FARC rebel group issued defiant statements following the U.S. military operation in Venezuela that led to the capture of Nicolás Maduro, framing the attack as a violation of regional sovereignty and vowing armed resistance against Washington.

In a statement released by its Eastern War Front, the ELN said that “once again U.S. imperialism violates the national sovereignty of the countries of Our America and the world,” and rejected what it described as a U.S. attack on the “Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela.”

The group expressed “solidarity and support for the Venezuelan people and government” and called on Latin American nations to “reject the gringo aggression, defend national sovereignty, and embrace unity and popular resistance,” as Infobae reports.

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    10 hours ago

    FUNNY HOW the msms suddenly dropped venezuela from the news, the moment the minnesota shooting happen, they need distractions constantly to get away from the epstein files.

  • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    How the hell did a random Columbian Guerilla end up running a fucking DPMS Kitty Kat?! Of all the choices in the world, that certainly is one of them.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Just a reminder that America has not won an armed conflict since WWII, and they have been absolutely savaged by guerilla warfare strategies in multiple conflicts.

    Everybody fears the American Military, and they will do a lot of damage when they come to your neighborhood, but ultimately, they can’t get out of their own way.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      its all about just overwhelming with numbers, not that different from russia but with hordes of orcs. theres no strategy in it.

    • Someone@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      18 hours ago

      And even saying they won WWII is generous in itself, they joined the winning side in progress.

    • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Yes this.

      The US Military is setup to fight and disable entire countries, not to sustain a ground occupation contested by native guerrilla forces.

      Urban warfare and the fact that native attackers can hide in civilian populations will grind any army down. There are simply too many avenues of attack in an urban environment.

      The Army wants to draw a line in the ground and completely dominate one side of the line and then deploy the capability to rain death on anybody within 100+ miles of that line. They don’t want to be clearing a neighborhood house to house and trying to detect every IED and ambush when any civilian could be holding a grenade or gun and any pile of rubble or trash could be an explosive.

      The only way this has been avoided in modern times is when Israel completely flatted most of Palestine, killing a large amount of civilians in the process. I don’t think Donald Trump would try to avoid that option.

      • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 hours ago

        It always amazes me when someone thinks they will invade a country, and deal with the old guy, install their own guy, and the people will all just be okay with it? They may have hated the old guy, but their going to hate the new guy just as much. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

        Unless the invading force is willing to get genocidal, which Stephen “PeeWee Himmler” Miller definitely is.

      • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        I don’t know. It’s not the 1960s anymore and Afghanistan is just an area built specifically to destroy empires. I fear that the modern war machine has capabilities now that it never had in the past. 24/7 satellite surveillance and AI monitoring. Digital forensics. Drones. Control of information networks and end points. They’d disappear these leaders in an instant and be able to trace their movement for the past month if they wanted. Any leader left to lead would be someone who is hurting their fight or leading them astray because it would be who America wanted to lead their revolution.

  • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    I am expecting them to join ICE, and go to town on MAGA. No better place to attack a titan, than from the insides of the beast.

  • Carmakazi@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    105
    ·
    2 days ago

    Those Colombian guerillas have been hiding in the jungle for decades. When the main body of FARC surrendered in 2017, many of them had never seen a smartphone before. They’ve been living the asymmetric warfare life since god knows when, they would prove extremely difficult to root out.

            • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Because some people go: akshually, we inflicted more casualties on the Vietnamese than they did to us so technically we are not defeated.

              It’s an often repeated excuse since the US signed the Paris Peace accords and agreed to pull out of Vietnam. A US official at the time told that to his North Vietnamese counterpart. The based North Vietnamese official quipped “that may be the case, but that is irrelevant.”

              • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                4 hours ago

                So dumb. Who’s in charge when the dust clears? There’s your winner.

                Hint: It wasn’t America. It’s never America. We haven’t won an armed conflict since WWII. Guerilla Warfare is highly effective against a massive force that can’t get out of its own way.

                After 20 years, and trillions of dollars, we left Afghanistan, and the Taliban was back in power within hours. What a waste.

                Osama Bin laden won 9/11.

                • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 hours ago

                  Also the defense contractors are likely happy that this happened, more moeny for them, and keeping the war going as long as possible even if there is no end in sight.

        • arrow74@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          What scares me is Trump may actually “win”.

          By this I mean, in Vietnam the US had an interest in installing a puppet government and having another state to oppose the Soviet Union.

          Trump just wants the oil fields. He’s not above leveling the whole country just to ensure access to the oil fields. He’s flirted with the idea of nukes before and I don’t put it past him to indiscriminately nuke large swaths of the rainforest/interior of Venezuela.

          He’s mad enough to do it too, and his base will support him. We’ve known a US that commits war crimes and then tries to ignore them. We’ve never seen a US willing to proudly and loudly commit war crimes to achieve its goals.

          Now is it a victory to render nearly half the country unliveable for decades? I personally dont think so, but Trump does and that’s the issue

            • arrow74@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 hours ago

              I wouldn’t say friendly more like not hostile.

              Like I wouldn’t call China a friendly country to the US, but they are jts biggest trading partner

      • Penguin_1024@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Except that Venezuela & Colombia are a lot closer to the US and a lot of the US population already speaks Spanish and the fact that a decent portion of the military is Hispanic.

        • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          not exactly, many venezuelans hate venezuela and maduro for displacing millions. hence why they are all voting republicans. its the same with vietnamese people too, very pro-right wing.

        • Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          What point do you think youre making here? Everything you listed is a reason it would be tougher for the US than Afghanistan or Vietnam.

          • 123@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            20 hours ago

            It does actually, but against an invading army. There are reports of Russian fighters having trouble executing orders because the “enemy” also spoke Russian in some instances of the Ukraine/Russia war.

            When there is a common language, the people sent to fight might notice there is more in common between them and the people on the other side than with the people in power that sent them there to die if needed.

              • zeca@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                What do you mean? Those are objective differences. Whats your point?

                • nostrauxendar@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Oh and uh actually it’s happening in a different year and the uniforms are different so really it’s objectively different to Vietnam after all checkmate

                • Amberskin@europe.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Hint: the Colombian military speak fluent Spanish and know the territory.

                  They have really good counterinsurgency units that have been fighting the guerrillas for years, with material and intelligence support from the USA.

                  They have been unable to destroy the guerrillas. And when the current government tried to end the remaining ones via negotiation, they sprawled again and basically toke control of the Catatumbo department.

                  If the US military get entangled in that fight, they will lose. After killing a lot of innocent civilians in the process.

                • titanicx@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  If you think that makes all the difference in the world. Good for you. Here’s your reward.

                  ¥57