Sure, in the most extreme cases it would be obvious to the crew. But simply making mistakes at a higher rate than humans will result in a lot of unhappy customers.

Capping waters fixes that one specific issue but not the problem.

A suspicious order isn’t easy to define and no person who has ever participated in software development would underestimate the infinite ways a User can break software.

I was just guessing (it’s how I’d do it) 🥳

Maybe each server shows up as a library. Like “Server 1 - Movies”

Kind of annoying but less so than swapping servers and search should work

and was only later appropriated into the proper noun you reference to describe the Nazi’s systematic persecution and extermination of Jews, Poles, Romani and other ‘undesirable’ minority groups.

Yes, that’s my point.

After 1930 it became a proper noun. We’re not speaking Ancient Greek and it’s after the 1930s.

I see Lemmy is filling up with people (not you, the downvote brigade that exists around politically charged topics) who conflate disagreement about minor issues with being on the other side of the argument. Nuance isn’t Ancient Greek either, but you’d think it was given the way people react on social media.

No. The Holocaust (a proper noun) refers to a specific genocide.

Neigh

Sounds like he’s qualified to be President of the United States

The US would never…

If your plan is to hope that Donald Trump saves you, you’ve made a lot of mistakes up until this point…

The elites only ever have one answer when the poors disagree with them: send in the police to arrest and hurt them until they stop.

It’s the same in every country.

Terminal commands, maybe some Python, I don’t remember all of my comments.

I’m a system administrator. I write technical articles for non-technical people and am primarily paid to sit around and keep things from exploding.

I have plenty of free time to get into slap fights on social media and I can probably type faster than I speak, so it isn’t a huge time investment to write a paragraph or two.

The insinuation that I’m a bot is a nice pivot, at least it’s more direct than a vague reference to my comment count. Though, you probably should have went with implying that I have no life or some other personal failing.

Implying that a bot can produce a large volume of coherent text will get you kicked out of the Luddite club…

It’s a condescending tone, actually.

I’m sorry if you think typing a few paragraphs is some herculean effort. I know it’s painful to have to step away from TikTok for so many seconds but keep at it and maybe one day you too can string more than two thoughts together in the same comment.

“You talk a lot” isn’t quite the burn you think it is but maybe if you keep rephrasing it a few more times it’ll land.

Everyone understands that social media is the primary vector of disinformation, but if you ever try to point out this process in actual practice people act like you’re talking nonsense.

Here we have a post started by some random account less than a day old which is suddenly rocketed to the top of the community.

• The OP lives in the thread full time for the entire day, not commenting anywhere else on Lemmy, and then disappears.

• This person simultaneously knows all of the anti-AI arguments by rote and also seems clueless as to why anti-AI posts get a lot of traction.

• The post is brigaded/botted, the vote:comment ratio is off, the downvoters are primarily accounts with no comment/post history (you can see upvotes and downvotes with moderation tools, they’re not private).

I would bet money that if a site admin were to look into the primary participants of this thread, you’d find that they’re all using VPNs. None of this on its own is suspicious, but taken all together it makes the thread very suspect.

I could be wrong, this isn’t exactly an easy thing to prove even when you have server admin tools. But I participate in the community quite heavily and am a moderator of a fairly populated instance (so I can see the server logs for our instance) and this post is giving off a lot of red flags.

Ah, I see we’re being mature now.

FauxLiving: na na na! I don’t like their opinion so this must be nonsense! stupid silly forum users cannot even have real values like me…

WhyJiffie: blah blah blah, I don’t have opinions of my own so I follow the downvoting winds to sling shit and ask dumb questions.

I would be interested in how did you amass 1400 comments in mere 5 months!

In Lemmy, if you type words into the text field and press the reply button it creates a comment. If you do it 2 times, then you have 2 comments. I’ll leave the rest of the exercise to the reader.

So, what model did the OP use?

Adobe has a massive company with a huge amount to lose if they’re lying to their customers. They have much more credibility than a random anti-AI troll account. Of course you’d want to dismiss them, it’s pretty devastating to your arguments if there are models which are built using artwork freely given by artists.

🤔, fair

I honestly don’t understand why you people insist on painting me in such a negative light, just because I am new. That is called bullying by the way.

“ask AI obsessed people”

This you? You use bad faith arguments and ad hominem and you’ll get the same back.

I guess a lot of people seem to care.

Yes, who knew AI was such a hot button issue on social media? /s

It seems incredibly unlikely that you could be unaware of the the volatility of the topic while also parroting all of the anti-ai talking points. Your mask is slipping.

You know that asking a question isn’t an answer, right?

These kind of posts always have the feeling of UFO or cryptid people dissecting a grainy 3 second clip of video and coming to the conclusion that Bigfooted Aliens exist.

They already have their conclusion before they even start.