Summary

Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich endorsed President-elect Donald Trump’s victory, stating it’s “time” to extend full Israeli sovereignty over the occupied West Bank.

This comes as Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu highlighted his alignment with Trump on the “Iranian threat.”

Tensions in Gaza and Lebanon have escalated following recent Israeli airstrikes, with regional leaders gathering in Riyadh to address Israeli actions.

Israeli President Isaac Herzog is set to meet President Biden, though Biden’s influence on Israel may be limited following Trump’s win.

  • glitchdx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 hours ago

    And notice how all the screeching about genocide has gone silent? Proves that they never actually cared.

  • maplebar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I mean, they aren’t wrong, are they?

    Hamas is all but defeated, Hezbollah is also on their back foot, and even the model caliphate, Iran, has proven to be almost completely ineffective against Israel’s defense system. Europe will make empty gestures about war crimes via the toothless ICC, and America is now totally controlled by the Republicans who never wanted a two-state peace process in the first place.

    Israel has never in their short history had a better opportunity to go for the power play and deal with the Palestinians however they please, and under Trump we can expect that they won’t get even a little bit of push back from the US, regardless of how harsh and violently they want to play it.

    I expect a fucking bloodbath and a full annexation of the Gaza Strip, the West Bank, and possibly parts of southern Lebanon.

    But hey, the American people have spoken, and I guess that’s what they wanted.

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        own the cowardice. Dems suck but every non voter has blood on their hands. Ignorance and apathy are not moral principles.

        • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I voted, but I have no power to change the outcome of the election. Only the democrats had this power, the blame lies only with them.

          Genocide lowers turnout. Saying you’re going to appoint republicans to your cabinet lowers turnout. Pledging to shut down the border and build the wall lowers turnout. Means testing all of your campaign promises lowers turnout. Running tough-on-crime campaign ads raises turnout FOR THE REPUBLICANS!

          We’ve been yelling that the dems will lose if they continue to go right for the last 4 years, but the dems either chose to move to the right on every issue either knowing it would lower their performance, or ignorant because blue maga like you helped shield them from the reality unfolding infront of all of us. I don’t know which is more damning.

          • Fedizen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            I agree the campaign was poor. I agree the party had small, terrible, and stupid ideas. I agree that chasing republicans is stupid.

            I will still however yell at cowards who coddle people who think not voting is anything but moral cowardice. Just own it. Take some fucking accountability. Its fine to have issues and complaints, its suicide to encourage people to go full karen.

            • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Blaming the people for the predictable effects of the dem’s actions deflects away from only entity that had the power to change the outcome and the only entity that will have the power to change this in 2026.

              It’s not constructive to go “Damn, I sure wish genocide didn’t decrease turnout for the dems”

              Just like in 2016, the dems deluded themselves into blaming the voters (specifically black people and/or the left) and bernie sanders instead of themselves, and we are watching them do it again in real time.

              • Fedizen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 hours ago

                I would argue democrat donors preferred a trump win and preferred dem turnout be low because they had a decent campaign for a second and shut it down.

                What your saying only makes sense if you operate from the idea dems want to win and not that they want to hand a victory their donors.

                In 2016 actual democrat operative tried to twistpeople’s arms to vote. This election that energy did not come from the mainstream democrats. Their pitch was “we don’t need you, we want republicans instead”.

                The calculus is different when you recognize both parties hate you.

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            Genocide lowers turnout.

            Which is exactly why Netanyahu made sure not to slow it down. Because low turnout=Republican win. And he knows which candidate will allow him to literally wipe Palestine off the map

            • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Biden sent Netanyahu every weapon he was allowed to, and had the military protecting Israel.

              If the Biden admin didn’t want Netanyahu to do this, they could have just not actively supported his efforts to do so.

              This was obvious to everyone from the beginning.

              Even blue MAGA were doing “But you still need to vote biden, even if the dems never stop facilitating genocide” since Oct 8th, because deep down, they understood the dems wouldn’t listen, even if it was going to cost them the election.

      • kerrypacker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Fuck you. Reevaluate your values and if you care so much, you go to the middle east and fight. Otherwise stop virtue signalling.

    • reddit_sux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Absolutely why should death and destruction be only there. Let also the exporter get a taste of their own product.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    2 days ago

    i hope all those lefties that refused to vote feel really accomplished now.

    congrats, guys! you did it!

    you installed a fascist dictator!

  • lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    2 days ago

    Anyone who abstained on grounds of Harris’s position on Gaza in my view have blood on their hands in what will not only assuredly he worse for Palestinians under Trump, but also the ongoing attempted genocide in Ukraine by Putin.

    They may as well be Trump voters to me and I want nothing to do with them.

    • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      2 days ago

      Most of the people spreading that bullshit here were .ml tankies and probably wanted trump elected anyway.

    • GiveMemes@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      2 days ago

      Worse than Trump voters actually. The vast majority of Trump voters have convinced themselves that what they’re doing is good, actually, and that the democrats are evil whereas the people who abstained from voting for Harris literally had a choice of a candidate that campaigned on making their number one issue worse, and one that at least attempted to talk about peace deals and decided to just have no impact whatsoever, condemning hundreds of thousands plus to certain death. They claim to be on the side of ending human suffering when in actuality, they’re little piss babies that are upset that their 10% of the population doesn’t have complete and total control.

  • joker125@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    2 days ago

    LeopardsAteMyFace.

    Unfortunately, this time around, for the Americans pretending to actually give damn on social meda, Gaza will be a parking lot soon.

    Just as Trump proclaimed.

  • Zachariah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    2 days ago

    Wait, why would it make any difference if Donald is elected?

    I thought everyone was saying that Biden and Harris were doing nothing about the Palestinians.

    • zephorah@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      2 days ago

      They said they wanted a two state solution. Trump has always been a burn it to the ground guy on that topic.

      Biden is Kamala’s boss, so she toes his line while VP, that’s how the job usually works, unless you’re Cheney.

      So playing the odds at least there’s a chance of survival with Kamala. With Trump it’s just nuked, but without actual nukes.

      But hey, Kamala wasn’t good enough so let’s go with the nukes👍

      Once again, human spite has the force to move mountains.

      • maplebar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Oh both can be true, but in this case they are not.

        There has always been valid reason to give arms to Israel, and there continues to be today. If you think that alone amounts to “supporting genocide” you’re about to be pretty upset when you watch the actual genocide that unfolds in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank over the next 4-8 years. Trump and Netanyahu are about to go scorched earth on Palestine like never in the history of the ~80 year war.

        Bernie fuckin’ Sanders could be POTUS today and he’d still send weapons to Israel, because they are our main ally in the region who also happens to under near-constant threats and attacks from multiple angles. The absolute best we can reasonably ask for is that weapons are sent on a conditional basis, but nobody wants to talk about that reality.

      • Dojan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        2 days ago

        I really hated all the moaning about people calling out that both are shitty options. The Overton window is so far to the right. Like, yeah Harris is clearly the better option but neither represent any positive moves forward.

        • Zorque@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          ·
          2 days ago

          For Palestine? Probably. In so many other options? It’s laughable that people think that the two candidates were in any way similar.

          Biden, and by extension Harris, have not waved their hands and saved the country (even if they could, which they can’t, because we elected politicians not magicians), but they have done leagues more for people than anything the Trump crowd has.

          Being ignorant of that is dangerous, but spreading that ignorance is borderline manslaughter for all the people who are going to be hurt because millions of people decided not to show up for this election that did for the last.

    • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      2 days ago

      Over 50% of the god damn country voted for a man who has so many major, should-be career ending flaws we don’t even need to list them anymore. If he kicked a puppy it wouldn’t even make the top 10 worst things he’s done. The democrats lost to the stupidest president of all time, a man who’s entire economic policy revolves around tariffs that he fundamentally doesn’t even understand and who cannot seem to open his mouth without lying.

      …and you’re here dunking on the people trying to oppose America’s blatant complicity in genocide. Well, you sure showed them.

      • papertowels@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 days ago

        Tbf the 50% that voted for trump aren’t here, plain and simple, so that’s why you don’t see engagement with them.

        The only political engagement you’ll see here on Lemmy shifts overwhelmingly left for all parties, so you’ll see mostly squabbling between various left factions.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          2 days ago

          Why do so many “moderates” insist on acting like the politically engaged people they run into online are the same people who are were so politically disengaged this year that they just didn’t vote?

          Like, could you please explain the thinking that someone wouldn’t vote and then keep spending free time talking about it?

          It’s not just you, and you’re not the first one I asked.

          But everyone else just down votes me for asking and never respond.

          • papertowels@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Well here’s a comment from someone I was talking to that was politically engaged yet arguing that folks might as well not vote.

            I’m not going into the thinking behind it, but it’s certainly happening.

            Being politically “engaged” on Lemmy doesn’t mean much in terms of ensuring voter participation. I’ve seen plenty of folks with a “democrats have to earn my vote” sentiment. That very much seemed to play out given the much lower voter participation for Democrats this year.

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 days ago

              Did you link the wrong comment?

              What you linked is just someone saying they can understand why someone who thinks both party’s won’t help, won’t be likely to vote.

              • papertowels@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                someone who thinks both party’s won’t help

                I don’t read it this way all - there was no conditional on party efficacy and it in fact was an assertion that their lives won’t change due to who was elected, which changed the overall statement to read like the working class shouldn’t vote.

                • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  So, the issue is you’re not understanding what people are saying…

                  You’re thinking they said something they didn’t and you’re getting upset about nothing.

          • Zorque@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            Probably for the same reason so many terminally online “politically engaged” people insist that they’re clearly morally and intellectually superior to everyone else despite the fact that all they do is whine about how the “lesser evil” (in just one of thousands of elections, no less) isn’t good enough for them.

            Maybe if you stopped focusing so much on the negatives, and started promoting positive change, people wouldn’t argue with you so much.

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              I think you’re confusing me for someone else

              I voted D like I always do, so have most progressive on here from what I’ve seen them say.

              What me, and them, have been saying is that Biden and Harris had our votes, but every indication show d they wouldn’t get enough to beat trump.

              It’s fine to be upset about that, we are too. Probably more than any moderate, we’re literally losing more than you all, that’s why we care.

              But what’s scary is this has all happened before. Moderates refuse to acknowledge they’re unpopular with Dem voters, and rather than reach out to progressives for help reaching non-votera…

              You all just seemed obsessed with turning more Dem voters away from the party.

              Maybe if you stopped focusing so much on the negatives, and started promoting positive change, people wouldn’t argue with you so much.

              The change we need is better Dem candidates, how the absolute fuck will that happen if we’re not allowed to acknowledge we keep running shitty candidates?

              Do you even remember how a fair and open primary is supposed to work?

              How is one of those ever possible if no one is allowed to criticize the party’s favorite?

        • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I really didn’t.

          Edit: meaning I am not American and if I was I would have voted Harris, not that Trump is not significantly worse.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        For some reason they still think they can bully people into voting for their guy. This has been thoroughly disproved but still they persist.

    • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      2 days ago

      The Harris campaign made the decision to not break from Biden on Israel, at the cost of a +6 points gain. That’s the fault of the campaign’s calculations to ignore those voters, take them for granted, and instead run to the right with Liz Cheney and having the most lethal Military.

      I voted for Harris and told others to do the same. It’s still on the campaign. Blaming voters is just sowing division when we need unity and solidarity to fight against Fascism.

      Quote

      Our first matchup tested a Democrat and a Republican who “both agree with Israel’s current approach to the conflict in Gaza”. In this case, the generic candidates tied 44–44. The second matchup saw the same Republican facing a Democrat supporting “an immediate ceasefire and a halt of military aid and arms sales to Israel”. Interestingly, the Democrat led 49–43, with Independents and 2020 non-voters driving the bulk of this shift.

      Quotes

      In Pennsylvania, 34% of respondents said they would be more likely to vote for the Democratic nominee if the nominee vowed to withhold weapons to Israel, compared to 7% who said they would be less likely. The rest said it would make no difference. In Arizona, 35% said they’d be more likely, while 5% would be less likely. And in Georgia, 39% said they’d be more likely, also compared to 5% who would be less likely.

      Quotes

      Quotes

      Quotes

      Majorities of Democrats (67%) and Independents (55%) believe the US should either end support for Israel’s war effort or make that support conditional on a ceasefire. Only 8% of Democrats but 42% of Republicans think the US must support Israel unconditionally.

      Republicans and Independents most often point to immigration as one of Biden’s top foreign policy failures. Democrats most often select the US response to the war in Gaza.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      2 days ago

      She does, so does Biden, just not to the extent trump will.

      It’s fucked up the DNC insisted on taking support of genocide as a binary topic out of this election.

      Just think, if they cared more about votes than dark money from a foreign government, trump might not be president elect right now. That was always an option you know? Giving Dem voters what they wanted, not just on this issues but multiple others.

      Do you think the gamble was worth it now?

      Are you willing to do anything different in four years?

      • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 days ago

        These people will blame us for the next 4 years and then blame us when the next neoliberal party darling loses in 2028. Anything they can do to deflect responsibility, hold anyone accountable, and prevent disrupting the status quo in this great race to the bottom.

      • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Biden and Harris already openly pledge unconditional material support to Israel in its genocide, organize Europe in this same direction, and go after anyone opposing them on this. Israel receives what it materially needs to do all pf this. Any further escalation in the West Bank will be done with materials, funds, and diplomatic cover provided by the Biden-Harris administration.

        Biden and Harris feign empathy and try to run little games around redefining what a ceasefire is for PR purposes. But in terms of the basic reakity of supporting Israel to do whatever it wants to Palestinians, as in providing them the means they would otherwise nit have to do it, there is no sense in which they are less bad than Trump.

    • P_P@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      There’s a lot of stupidity reflected in these elections.

      • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’ve said before (and will say again) that US elections are like our national-scale county fairs: idiots that your normally never see come out of the woodwork.

    • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Harris did and does support genocide and if you tolerated that you should do some self-criticism.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    ·
    2 days ago

    I remember commenting a couple months back on one of those “Arab-Americans not voting for Harris” posts, something along the lines of “it’s your vote, but I think that you’re going to find that you’d rather have Harris than Trump” and listing some past policy moves like the embassy in Jerusalem, and then someone downvoting and responding something along the lines of “identical candidates”.

      • TheFriar@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Do you guys think lemmy is a valuable enough target to deploy bot propaganda accounts? I’m not sure I think so.

        • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          Like facebook, twitter, and reddit, where there is a concerted effort, that has people working on how to specifically target the people on each one, and understand the differences in their use, and users? No, of course not. Are there bots spreading national, and corporate, propaganda on lemmy? Yes. They are literally everywhere you can make posts. I am willing to bet there are tiny fora out there, with like 10 users, that occasionally sees bot spam.

          • TheFriar@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 hours ago

            I dunno man. I think it’s much more likely we are seeing the product of the bots. You can’t expect every single site with comments to have propaganda bots. It takes a much smaller number of bots of bots to affect a much larger number of people. Someone has to program and deploy bots to places, the bots can’t just show up anywhere and everywhere there is political conversation

            • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              You can totally make programs to scrape the internet for places that have posting functionality, crawl the scraped sites, and auto post. These already exist, and you can buy them, or get them shared to you from various sources. Most of these sites use template software to run their sites. It is not nearly as difficult as people might think to accomplish this. Bot traffic is 50% of internet traffic.

              Is there a group somewhere, sitting in a government facility, working on how to best infiltrate Lemmy? I really doubt it. Do these places have general function bots that make it on to lemmy, and even smaller places? Yes. In fact, bots are causing a growing number of small sites to experience what is, essentially, DOS attacks, because of how much traffic suddenly hits the site once the scrapers/auto account makers/etc. have found it.

      • Zorque@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’ve absolutely still seen people making those arguments. It’s fuckin’ wild.

    • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      I remember a couple months back when Kamala Harris swapped in for Joe Biden and her popularity peaked through the fucking roof when people thought she was going to stop the genocide.

      Then Kamala said she was going to continue the genocide and kicked Palestinians out of the DNC.

    • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      And I think you will find that there has been no material difference in what “Israel” is actually doing. They’ve been ramping up occupation and violence in the West Bank for months, going in exactly this direction already. They murdered an American activist in the West Bank as part of this and swept it under the rug using the pretense of an “investigation”, remember? The West Bank is already occupied, it is already split into isolated districts, travel is already highly restricted, there are racist curfews for those who must commute to work in Israel, forced through several checkpoints and fearing jail for any delays, giving themselves 3 hour buffers for travel tine, and their government is compradors that work with the IOF to arrest and jail them and out down resistance movements.

      The main difference between Dems and GOP on Israel is that Dems feign empathy and concern while Republicans are openly racist. But materially the outcomes are actually very similar, with Dems often being worse because they can more effectively count on your lack of dissent and in coordinating with Europe.

      You might remember that there has been a US-backed genocide in Gaza for over a year, under a Dem, and they were willing to lose the election rather than stop supporting genocide.

      • Iampossiblyatwork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 days ago

        Lol. Imagine making a reductive statement to a vastly complicated topic to try and sound smart only to reveal how little you understand. On the internet no less!

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 days ago

          They’re emotional but they’re also correct. Israel controls the West Bank in all but name already.

          • Doorbook@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            2 days ago

            people don’t even bother checking what israel has been for the last year and then make statement “democrat would be better”. Israel with AIPAC own the US. They democrats government couldn’t even say ceasefire nor did Canada, France, or Germany. Democrat and Republic has different approach to China and Russia and maybe Iran, but Palestinian ? there is no way democrat would stop anything.

  • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 days ago

    That finance minister is a Kahanist (Israeli fascist), he doesn’t just want to annex parts of the west bank. He wants to annex all of the west bank and Gaza while renaming both. As someone living in Israel I’ve seen how people are already calling the west bank “Judea and Sumera”. He also wants to kill all Arabs and Muslims.