• Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    37 minutes ago

    You know what? Fucking do it.

    Inflation will really fucking suck for a while, but anything that makes renewables and nuclear the better option is going to be a good thing in the long term. Strangle the oil industry with high prices, we fucking need it.

    • insomnia@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 minutes ago

      This won’t just affect oil by the way, fertilisers are a direct product of natural gas, bunkering, electricity, transport, the list goes on.

      The ripple effect might just pop the AI bubble. Good luck.

    • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 minutes ago

      haha, reminds me that in 2007 I was delivering flowers when gas prices spiked and I made the mistake of opining that it wasn’t all bad - for basically that reason. The owner did NOT appreciate my comments. lol.

      Nothing came of it or anything, it was just a little awkward for a bit. And I did express sympathy for her costs. But she could have optimized deliveries SO much better - I tried to help - but she just didn’t care. Even though… it cost her much more gas. heh

      She was a good person, just a little blind about some things. :)

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    5 hours ago

    A year from now, after we’ve been paying $5 a gallon for gas, we’ll find out the oil companies had the biggest record profit year in their history. Then they’ll announce layoffs.

    • Jarix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      34 minutes ago

      Fyi Canadians pay well over 5$ a gallon. I’m sure others pay significantly more as well.

      Just explaining so you know that many people won’t understand your comment

  • BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    5 hours ago

    This is TERRIBLE! We paid Trump MILLIONS of Dollars and FUNDED a War with Venezuela! HOW could he Do this to US!

    -Oil CEOS!

    • Kirp123@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      5 hours ago

      So this makes me think. Did they attack Venezuela first to get access to the oil there and prevent a price spike from happening when they attacked Iran? Or am I giving the current regime too much credit?

      • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        34 minutes ago

        Reminder that literally not one single major oil company wanted to be involved in Trump’s plans to exploit Venezuelan oil - with the exception of the one company already there, who basically suggested they might make some very, very small expansions to their operations - because all of them thought it was an idiotic idea.

      • JollyG@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Considering that representatives from the Trump cabinet appeared to be surprised that Iran can and did block the strait of Hormuz, I’d say you are giving too much credit.

        Also, the US is a net exporter of oil. National supply concerns aren’t the issue so much as global supply shock. Restrictions anywhere lead to price hikes.

        • marcos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          It’s doubtful if most of the reserves can become viable at any price. (Because the cost of materials increase when oil price increase.) But some are perfectly viable.

          But also, even in perfect conditions, if they started drilling right now (what they aren’t), it will take several month to start getting any of it.

        • Kirp123@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Well if the price goes up then it becomes feasible to extract it. Same with the oil the US has at home. They could also extract it if the price gets too high, the reason they aren’t doing so now is because the Middle East oil is cheaper (well, WAS cheaper).

      • RamRabbit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Venezuelan oil production fell off a cliff starting around 2015 and has only recovered to a third of what it was then. It will take years to build industry there back up, so it won’t do much right now. However, once it is built back up, it will be a major exporter again.

  • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Demand destruction will start happening well before it reaches $200/bbl.

    Prices of $120-140 begin demand destruction and economic recessions (as 2022 showed), with destruction accelerating past $160. Transportation costs doubling will put almost immediate halts on capex planning for most organizations. I would be surprised if sustained prices beyond $160/bbl could exist for more than a couple weeks before the global economy tail spins so fucking hard it immediately stops consuming the oil supply lost from the strait of Hormuz.

    • Krono@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Are you sure you aren’t underestimating the huge volume of demand that needs to be destroyed? I believe something like 20%-25% of demand needs to be destroyed, in both the crude and LNG markets.

      The last time demand was 20% lower than baseline was during the two worst months of Covid, when the majority of people were staying inside their home

      So the question is: how high does the price of oil have to get in order to force people to consume like they did under the worst of Covid?

      I’m no economist, but my gut feeling says it will be sustained significantly higher than $160/barrel.

    • Fluffy Kitty Cat@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 hours ago

      There’s also renewables. Solar is already cost competitive and there’s no way EVs aren’t flying off the shelves right now

      • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Too late. Manufacturing and installing renewables or EV’s or literally anything requires diesel.

        The entire industrial supply chain is still built on diesel with decades to go before the current glacial pace of electrification makes a significant dent. A massive energy crunch is just going to make renewable buildouts even more materially constrained and astronomically more expensive, there is no way out without economic collapse. The current economic system is not designed around anything other than fossil fuels and will refuse to complete a changeover until no other options exist, which will usually mean billions of homeless starving people getting fucked over.

  • ol_capt_joe@piefed.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 hours ago

    So how is a local rebellion supposed to work when a fat orange won’t take his short, weird fingers off the ‘fire missiles at everything’ button?

    • leoj@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 hours ago

      the black smoke was supposed to be cover so they can organize… right?

  • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Well of course our babies have been drilling nonstop since Trump arrived so surely production’s gone up 115% to offset the loss of 15 million barrels per day!