Any new alternative on international settlements is welcome…

But the main BRICS countries have been creating new payment methods for a while now, with a few successes. So, what is he talking about?

Has anybody actually looked at the paper instead of reacting to The Guardian’s reaction?

Because as bad as the Nobel Prize Committee is at their job, that doesn’t look like something you would find in one.

You don’t see the relation between those?

for the less intelligent folks

Yeah, ok.

Global warming doesn’t care if you like the news or not.

He’s publicly accusing Israel of supporting Trump. He didn’t publicly accuse them of anything before that.

There has been a change in what he says.

But yeah, still nothing on what he does.

The US has been pushing a few news on their propaganda machines trying to distance themselves from Israel. I don’t think they’ll go all-in into a war.

The nightmare scenario is it being caused by something even more insidious and omnipresent than microplastics. The second nightmare scenario is microplastics.

Coal mining releases a great deal of methane and other green-house gasses. It’s not clear whether it’s more or less than the LPG entire chain.

A serious paper would compare the entire picture of both. Or at least look at one and refrain from opining about the other.

It’s stated right there on the paper’s abstract.

Yet another study that didn’t bother looking at emissions in mining and processing of coal, just on the ones from natural gas.

in the past, said Datena wasn’t man enough to hit him

He said it, several times just before Datena hitting him.

Yet he’s carrying a Russian proposal straight out to Ukraine… so different.

Historically, that depends if the US is threatening to invade them or not.

when they’re actively supplying a genocide

Yeah, and now Iran is too.

Anyway, the people within a country are perfectly able to complain. They don’t have to agree with the actions of their government.

Wait, this is not on a meme community?!?

That “captive” word is quite plain. You are the one overlooking it, this is not your normal corporate-speak.

As the GP points, it’s not so simple. The landholders are not the super-rich, the super-rich are all politicians, without exception. The next tier of Brazilian riches are industrialists, and nearly all of those got everything they have by exploiting political connections.

And guess what, the successful politicians of today are all people that developed their political career during the last dictatorship or close allies of them. And if you look at party financing, media allocation, and how the electoral courts behave, the reason becomes obvious quite quickly.

They’ve got from poor into a middle-economy country, trapped just like the rest of us Brazil, Argentina, Russia, India and etc by the lack of a real Democracy that will let people invest on themselves.

Yep.

The range is both very important and not applicable to your question. Ukraine fighters will always reach the war zone, whatever range they have, because fighters with less capacity will take-off closer to it and thus be more at risk.