South Korea says it has detected preparations by North Korea to blow up its sections of inter-Korean roads. Tensions have been soaring between the two countries in recent weeks.

South Korean officials said on Monday that they had gathered intelligence indicating that the North was preparing to demolish its half of roads that connect the two countries.

“They have installed screens on the road and are working behind those screens, preparing to blow up the roads,” Lee Sung Joon, a spokesperson for South Korea’s Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters.

He said the operation could take place as soon as Monday.

The move follows weeks of soaring tensions on the Korean peninsula. North Korea has accused South Korea of using drones to drop propaganda leaflets over its territory three times, and threatened to respond with force if it happens again.

  • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    1 month ago

    Oh for fucks sake, now this?? Can we all just take a step back and calm down, between ‘US/Taiwan/China’, ‘Ukraine/Russia’ and ‘Israel/Every Decent Person’ my ability to worry about new things is at it’s limit, kindly give it a month then try this again okay Kim?

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Oh for fucks sake, now this?? Can we all just take a step back and calm down, between ‘US/Taiwan/China’, ‘Ukraine/Russia’ and

      I suppose sealing the border may be related, as North Korea is also sending soldiers to Ukraine, and this happened at about the same time.

      That being said, it’s also true that North Korea pretty regularly does attention-getting things, and I suppose that it’s not impossible that this is one of those.

      • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        This isn’t even that attention getting. North Korea has consistently stated over the past few years that they no longer entertain the idea of reunification.

        Blowing up internal roads isn’t that provocative.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 month ago

      Dude, getting rid of some roads isn’t going to start WWIII.

      North Korea probably just needs money again and they ran out of rockets to shoot into the ocean, which is what they usually do when they need money.

      • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        Seems like being stressed out over two nuclear powers (even if one of them has the tinkertoy equivalent of an arsenal…) playing geopolitical chicken isn’t the most unreasonable reaction I could have.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              My point is that this sort of thing has been regularly happening with North Korea for years. And far more aggressive acts too. This is not the end of it all.

              Edit: Also, South Korea has no nuclear weapons, so this isn’t between two nuclear powers.

              • Agreed - NK likes to saber rattle a lot. This is just more of the same.

                One thing I have to begrudingly admit - they are really smart at approaching the edge of the line (to a nation ending war), without crossing it.

                Also, it’s true that South Korea is not a nuclear armed State, but I can see why NK might sometimes feel like the opposite. South Korea hosts nukes from the US (for the defense of Korea) and is under the nuclear umbrella of the US (where the US promises to use nuclear weapons to defend South Korea if it’s attacked by a nuclear armed opponent).

                More saliently, South Korea has successfully launched into outer space - this is the same rocket technology needed to launch an ICBM. So even if the US broke away, South Korea could go nuclear very quickly.

                These are all part of NK’s calculation when it considers how far it’s willing to go in saber rattling.

              • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                Did I say somewhere I thought this was going to turn into WWIII, or that this would be the end of it all? No, I said it was yet another extremely stressful thing to heap onto the pile. You’re inventing what I said and arguing against that.
                (The united states was the 2nd nuclear power to which I was referring. There are ample US nuclear assets stationed in KR.)

                  • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 month ago

                    From your article:

                    Under the new deal, the US will make its defense commitments more visible by sending a nuclear-armed submarine to South Korea for the first time in 40 years, along with other strategic assets, including nuclear-capable bombers.

                    Dude, squiddy, even a single Ohio class submarine could wipe out half the life on this planet. I get you think I haven’t understood your message, and maybe you think this is somehow helpful instead of incredibly patronizing, but it’s concerning that the moderator of a news community doesn’t understand that news can be both important to read and at the same time deeply stressful.

      • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s not, but I don’t think it’s money.

        Putin told kju the west was weak, and now was the time to strike, just like he told Xi in 2022.

        Kju will posture because he isn’t sure whether to believe or not, and mildly ratting his saber covers all eventualities.

        Iran was similar, as was Hamas, putin is pushing for maximum instability in hopes that the west will decide supporting Ukraine is too risky.

        The problem is: we’ve see this all before, appeasement doesn’t bring peace, it just encourages more war.

        This is really part of Putin’s whole contingency plan of forming a counter to nato, with all the worst outcasts and China, because he figured half the world would rally around him after kyiv fell.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Rally around him or at least be Neville Chamberlains. He’s mostly gotten the latter from the minority of nations not condemning him and very little of the former.

          • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            Tbf to him, from his vantage point the fall of Afghanistan did seem like the signal to strike.

            He just vastly underestimated the underlying strength of the west because we basically exaggerate our capabilities far less than he’s used to under vranyo, so our minor defeat wasn’t actually a sign of us hiding our complete collapse.

            • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              fall of Afghanistan

              You mean the fall that he orchestrated via trump?

              If you want to consider that the start, Putin started it.

              • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                Heh, I agree, much like he contributed massively to Brexit.

                But understand this: In this story, he’s the main character, he sees things a bit differently, for him re-uniting the Russian Empire is a matter of destiny and anything that helps was meant to be, while any setbacks must be sabotage of the natural way by the evil and petty western powers.

                That’s just how things look at that level, it’s why dictatorships are bad, they reinforce narcissistic blindness.

      • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        No, them posturing surely isn’t. I’m just at the point where it’s just a little bit much to add “nuclear power throwing a tantrum in the grocery store aisle of geopolitics” on top of everything else

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        As someone who is apparently an “authority” on every issue in the universe while on c/worldnews… Don’t bother. Trust me.

        • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          See, this is what I’m talking about. You’re not an authority on the topic at hand, you’re an authority figure within this community. Why are you pivoting to passive-aggressively talking past the actual person? That’s just mean, and petty, and you’re better than this, man. You clearly understand what I was saying, so how does doing this further the conversation? Why are you intentionally misrepresenting what I was saying to you?

          Is it really that hard to acknowledge even polite criticism?

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            you’re an authority figure within this community.

            Cool, then I’m going to use that authority to tell you to leave me alone.

            • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Why not just block me, then? You’re the one telling other people to “Don’t bother. Trust me.” when I comment on totally unrelated to you posts, and then threatening me when I call you out for your behavior.
              That’s not just not okay, dude.

              That’s literal harassment.

              From the lemmy.world TOS:

              Before using the website, remember you will be interacting with actual, real people and communities. Lemmy.World is not a place for you to attack other people or groups of people. Just because you disagree with someone doesn’t give you the right to harass them. Discuss ideas and be critical of principles. Show the respect you desire to receive.

              For my part in this, I’m sorry? I don’t entirely know what for, but evidently you’re hurting, and that really was never my intent.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                I didn’t threaten you. Hence your comment not getting deleted and you not getting banned for not leaving me alone. I guess I’m not the authority figure you think I am.

                Please do continue to do this silly rant at me though. As long as you don’t violate any rules, there’s nothing I’ll do about it.

                And if you feel I am harassing you, you should definitely report me to Lemmy admins. Will you do it?

          • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            No, they’ve repeatedly demonstrated to not be “better than this”. It’s Unidan all over again.