Just a smol with big opinions about AFVs and data science. The onlyfans link is a rickroll.
As I understand it it’s been the standard since 2.0 and continues to be the case, even for high-power systems. From personal experience of trying to make a USB-C USB killer for PD, it’s also just damned difficult to do. USB is an extremely resilient standard.
As much as it would be convenient, a plane simply does not have the electrical capacity to supply all passengers with high wattage USB outlets. Large numbers of high-capacity of lithium batteries are a solution, but are also a risk and given the recent number of fires caused by faulty Lithium battery packs, it’s unfortunate but reasonable for carriers to move to restrict them for the sake of passenger safety.
A USB transceiver is required to withstand a continuous short circuit of D+ and/or D- to VBUS, GND, other data line, or the cable shield at the connector, for a minimum of 24 hours without degradation
Shorts aren’t really a concern with decent hardware, but as far as I can tell that’s the problem with the power banks that are failing - they’re not decent hardware, so minor damage attached to a very energetic bag o’ chemistry results in (very occasional) fiery disaster.
If you’re that worried about it (and don’t have at least a passthrough charging cable), you can just turn your devices off and bring a book. I don’t know why you’d be worried about it killing your devices though, if a plane’s electrical system has failed so badly it’s going to fry things on the USB bus then you’ve got much bigger problems.
They’re doing that too:
The concern driving this ban is primarily centered around defective units already in circulation, and the acceptance that they cannot realistically be certain about their ability to prevent manufacturers in other countries from shipping in more potentially defective units. Most modern airplanes I have seen have in-seat USB charging ports, which at least cuts down on the need some, and a few hours without a charged device is not going to end the lives of anyone traveling (especially since this rule has carve outs for medical devices, I’m told).
"Hans, I have the best idea"
A good sentiment, though I suspect you shouldn’t hold your breath on the prison thing - he’s already been released from custody.
Evidently the troll accusation isn’t entirely baseless either…
This is possibly the most excruciating second-hand embarrassment I have ever felt at someone’s wildly tasteless self promotion. Seriously, Lemmy is not the place to gain haters or fans - take this routine to reddit.
It’s a recent revelation - likely at most he’s been suspended while the accusations are investigated.
Here’s hoping him and Mitch McConnell share a cramped room in hell…
The email at the center of the viral post was not written by Bill Gates. It was written by Jeffrey Epstein — to himself.
Both the “From” and “To” fields list Epstein’s personal Gmail address. The message appears to be a draft, written during a period when Epstein’s relationship with Gates had deteriorated. In it, Epstein alleges that Gates asked him to delete messages related to an STD. But the document does not show Gates making that request, nor does it provide independent confirmation that any of the claims are true.
Yeah it’s just an ad for a truecrime book, wtf.
And in at least one canadian one, who if anyone appears to be the party with the true “flaw” in their security (but it’s really just a systemic weakness, and sadly one I expect will be ended because of this dickhead’s meddling). It’s actually a fascinating story - he was given the ability to set up credentials as part of his job (or was able to re-submit himself for a second set somehow, I’m reading conflicting accounts of exactly how it was done), then just set up an alternative identity for himself that persisted after he left. As far as I understand it the identity was legitimate, it was just never removed from the system so he simply continued to use it. Probably the most interesting thing is that it’s so common for pilots and flight attendants to fly inter-carrier, I would not have expected it to be as abusable as it turns out to be.
… christ, I have no idea if this is legit or not. Maybe… No? Just because he’d have to admit defeat?
I hate to point this out, but it’s 2026.
Everything else is great though.
She’s pretty pro-trump, but to my eye the distinction between if she’s courting trump because she just wants the influence he’ll bring or if she genuinely believes in his insanity it seems like the same result to me - she’s willing to treat with a murdering pedophile wannabe tyrant for power, that’s pretty damning on it’s own.
She’s pretty pro-trump, she probably will give it to him; it seems like an incredibly obvious bribe.
Why is trump doing something I’ve advocated that the US should be doing (removing embassy staff from Israel) suddenly so ominous? Goddamnit I hate this fucker.
Last I checked, only three states (AZ, MA and OK) have required english instruction - only one of them (MA) requires english immersion instead of ESL or bilingual-specific classes, and all three allow for public-funded nonenglish education, just outside the district.