• Jtotheb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    Also due to reduced water vapor and ice cover lol. It’s a conclusion that can be drawn without much reliance on the article, which focuses a lot on specific climate model improvements and not the obvious concern: given our desire for the earth to reflect more of the sun’s rays and cool off, reflecting fewer and warming up is not good

    • protist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      “The extinction of all life in Earth” is not a reasonable conclusion to draw from this

      • Jtotheb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Oh, right. I barely clock exaggerations of that sort anymore. People reach straight for the top shelf with their words. Especially in this case I think it works in environmentalists’ favor. Maybe I’m wrong and we should be more concerned about pushback when people overstate the case, but even within the left I’ve encountered few people who seem to profess that much interest in biodiversity or wild plant/animal/fungal rights to existence, so misunderstanding the issue in exaggerated terms at least evokes concern rather than apathy. It’s not like the conservative’s real issue with climate change is that akshually “life” in the broadest sense will find a way to adapt.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yeah, between extremophiles that will probably outlast the atmosphere and the mesozoic having been pretty balmy, life finds a way. That said, complex life is about to have a very bad time, especially specialists that can’t handle wide temperature ranges. It’s an extinction event, and our species is gonna have to really try to survive it.