From Wikipedia:

In 2018, Witkoff opposed sanctions against Russia for its occupation of Crimea.

Witkoff has praised Russian president Putin and has appeared to support Russian government claims about its war against Ukraine. He said that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine was “not necessarily” started by Russia, that NATO had a significant role in provoking the conflict, and that most Eastern Ukrainians want to live under Russian rule.

I downloaded this from Reddit on 6/22/12:

Congressional Democrats subpoenaed Epstein’s estate, then released them publicly

If you read the article, social media influencers are pushing private 3rd-party blood tests that return with a recommendation to get testosterone supplementation. People are showing up to appointments asking for testosterone based on these tests rather than based on any conversation with their doctor

when she has never ever got close enough to anyone unless they are getting paid for it?

What are you on about here

Seems like I keep seeing stories about Cuba, but Jamaica is about to get absolutely fucked

Does it matter?

The famines, which outside of World War II when the Nazis deliberately attacked their farms, and outside of the 1930s, which had famine induced by weather disaster and magnified by privledged capitalist farmers called “kulaks” destroying their livestock and grain to prevent collectivization?

You’re really looking at this through red-tinted glasses. It’s ok to admit that there were also serious missteps by Stalin that magnified the extent of this famine, and that it was intentionally made worse for some ethnic minorities.

Are you seriously thinking this is how revolution in the US would go?

I just didn’t get what you titled this post from the actual article. The article just says McKinsey found only 30% of AI deployments they looked at actually saw a return on investment and that AI vendors have to figure that out in order to continue to sell AI services.

While this may be something that has happened, this definitely is not something “the homeless do” in the US

Life is incredibly resilient, a ton of life is going to survive and adapt just fine. You think marginally increased global temperatures are worse than the Chicxulub impact? It’s crazy that in the face of environmental catastrophe people can still find ways to irrationally catastrophize

“The extinction of all life in Earth” is not a reasonable conclusion to draw from this

It’s pretty big leap from the Earth absorbing slightly more energy from the sun to “the extinction of all life on Earth.”

That’s actually not clear at all. How did you draw this conclusion from what’s written here? It cites decreased pollution across the northern hemisphere as one of the drivers of this, for example, and how is that horrifying?

This is pretty amazing. There’s so much we don’t know

France is not comparable to Cuba in this scenario

They look like good, strong hands…

Like what?

But there’s also the cancer