There was a British charity, The Spastic Society. They became fairly high profile in the early 80s being involved in children’s magazine shows for fund raising. Often children with conditions would be featured. The intent was that featuring them would make the condition more relatable, but kids saw them more freaks to be mocked.
It resulted in “spastic” / “spaz” becoming school playground taunts to the extent that the charity changed it’s name to avoid the term.
There’s a few term of that kind of age which were like that. Medical terms or just plain English words that became labelled “derogatory” because of how they were used. I always felt it showed how poor the vocabulary of some people was. If they only knew the derogatory meaning they’d get offended by it’s use in all situations even if the meaning was innocent.
Inference of 3D models exists. Combined with a rule deck of what the machine is capable of (i.e. so tools aren’t broken) I think you could be very close to “prompt to object” prototyping flows — if they don’t already exist.
Still might need a pair of hands to clean up.
Now, how many botched tries are people willing to to pay the material cost of, who knows?
I don’t see how that helps the validity of race as a concept.
You’re question assumes race is a real thing and not just something made up by people.
Cultures and communities are real. There’s Native American culture, Indian culture, Swedish culture and English culture. There is no “white” culture. It’s the clash of cultures than normally causes the problems we see in the world that we mislabel as “race”.
No you’re not the only one.
The US has an obsession with race which is understandable but deeply unhealthy. It will never heal as a country until it can get over it’s obsession.
You weren’t wrong. Just unlucky.
Homeschooling can’t give kids social interaction, which is just as important as the material. You can always tutor your kids in addition to what happens in school if you think the quality is low.
Reveal.js for me. Can still use latex equations via Mathjax.
Two points
It’s not a forgone conclusion by any means.
It’s unhealthy because holding on to stuff like this just poisons you.
Do you know that she was involved in your move, or do you just suspect it? If it’s the latter, has it occured to you you might be wrong?
No, quite the opposite. Models are largely a mass of random looking numbers that can’t be compressed losslessly.
Hp is doing laptop rental for non-commercial customers only.
Strawman centrists are drawn as people who think the right choice between genocide and peace is only-killing half. This is obviously nonsense, yet you’ll see it a lot even in this thread.
A proper centralist is someone that disposes with political tribalism and instead chooses their position on issues individually. Sometimes they’ll agree with one party, sometimes another. It depends who has the better policy. They believe that no party has all the answers.
I would say that if everybody did this it would be fantastic.
However, they are rarer that rocking horse shit.
You can tell it is by the missing part of the image.
CANZUK needs to meet, sure.
They’re saying it can’t be used as a reason for assigning blame in a divorce. Infidelity is a classic example of when someone can be “at fault” and so assigned blame for the marriage ending.
“No-fault” divorce exists for situations where the relationship is no longer tenable but not because anyone did anything damaging.
They did say it would be removed as a reason for “fault-based” divorce, not divorce generally. You won’t be able to say “he’s at fault for not wanting sex” and so get a preferential settlement.
The point I’m making is there’s so much technological development in manufacturing that has to take place before you can even start, it probably wouldn’t happen any faster. Just the technology that builds the machines that builds the machines that build the chips is beyond the 1920s.
Turing’s papers on computing were all pre-WW2 anyway.