

No, quite the opposite. Models are largely a mass of random looking numbers that can’t be compressed losslessly.


No, quite the opposite. Models are largely a mass of random looking numbers that can’t be compressed losslessly.


Hp is doing laptop rental for non-commercial customers only.
Strawman centrists are drawn as people who think the right choice between genocide and peace is only-killing half. This is obviously nonsense, yet you’ll see it a lot even in this thread.
A proper centralist is someone that disposes with political tribalism and instead chooses their position on issues individually. Sometimes they’ll agree with one party, sometimes another. It depends who has the better policy. They believe that no party has all the answers.
I would say that if everybody did this it would be fantastic.
However, they are rarer that rocking horse shit.


You can tell it is by the missing part of the image.


CANZUK needs to meet, sure.


They’re saying it can’t be used as a reason for assigning blame in a divorce. Infidelity is a classic example of when someone can be “at fault” and so assigned blame for the marriage ending.
“No-fault” divorce exists for situations where the relationship is no longer tenable but not because anyone did anything damaging.


They did say it would be removed as a reason for “fault-based” divorce, not divorce generally. You won’t be able to say “he’s at fault for not wanting sex” and so get a preferential settlement.


So people are concerned that Chinese cameras pointing at the Magna Carta will be used to… What?.. read the Magna Carta? That doesn’t sound like a bad thing. They could probably do with understanding that laws also apply to those that rule.
If they’re just working out that cheap cameras aren’t reliable enough for security, that’s something different.


They’re already their own separate war crime. Let’s not cheapen what “genocide” means.


The UK has problems, but are you seeing what’s going on in the US right now?


Just like every other sector.


For a peacekeeping mission, there has to be a peace to keep.
He’s asking for combat troops.


Without Europe Ukraine would have already fallen.
Europe is playing the role the US did for a long time in WW2 with the Transatlantic convoys. Supplies.
What Ukraine is asking for is a full blown conflict between Europe and Russia. I think it’s right to try to avoid that.


US Gov: “We’re not an apartheid state!”
[A few moments later…]
US Gov: “…errrm”


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6MOnehCOUw
I heard that Kubrick was such a perfectionist, he insisted they shot on location.


I think, at best, it shows that the observations are consistent with the model, or to take it back to the blurry low light photo… The photo wasn’t obviously not Trump.
I remember reading the original paper at the time and thinking, if I had been a reviewer I’d have wanted clear acknowledgement of the confirmation bias danger in the methodology. Ideally some sort of quantification of risk. It just seemed like too large a flaw to just be glossed over.


@Tamo240@programming.dev and yourself.
Having triggered this conversation off, I’ll just congratulate you both on a quality discussion. I’ll admit I used loose terminology in my original post, but that was mainly to get my point across to a general audience. The specificity you both went to is laudable.


She was the least worst candidate without a doubt. She wasn’t a good candidate.


I don’t mean LLM. I mean a specific ML model for the job, but still trained off simulations.
It’s unhealthy because holding on to stuff like this just poisons you.
Do you know that she was involved in your move, or do you just suspect it? If it’s the latter, has it occured to you you might be wrong?