Shift over?

More language issues, keyboard combat related stroke imminent. No great mind will be lost though.

Look who had the language issues all along. They really hire the absolute bottom of the barrel don’t they?

Does the chairforce have advanced technologies to prevent oiling up keyboards with cheeto dust? I hear it causes PTSD in servicemen.

Ok vaush. Hope the new ozempic shipment reaches the base within schedule because cholesterol and desk jobs is more lethal than conventional combat.

US foreign policy shill pretending to be a communist but defending Al Qaeda jihadis pretends not to know what question marks are.

So are you saying that your brainwashing is “objective” even though you’re a Fox News “communist”? All I’m asking for is consistency.

Pro-religious thing you said? You’re here whining about the rights of monks to brainwash kids and Uyghur jihadis lmao.

You’ve been incapable of answering any of my questions so far and switched to one liners? Typical shill.

Too advanced for Eglin chairforce base tactical cheeto eaters.

Pro-religious propaganda communist, sure buddy. Crickets about everything else as usual.

Shutup vaush.

So you were pushing anti-communist propaganda all along and had all these cocksure anti-PRC beliefs already but disguised them as care for feudal theocratic brainwashing of minors? So you can’t really argue about literally anything I said like Tibet having a local government of Tibetan communists that you discount entirely because you’re an anticommunist shill and not because you care about anything other than manufacturing anti-PRC consent? So you do this using articles from explicitly pro-western propaganda sites like the one above but would never consider checking the other side and yet you call others “cock sure”? So you’re so clueless enough to mix up leninism with maoism even though neither invalidate Tibet having a Tibetan government anyway? So unless a nation is an ethnostate there’s oppression happening? So only voting for bougie duopoly parties every four years is “democratic” but open access to constant voting and decision making through local governments available to all citizens who want to get involved isn’t democratic because Murican crapitalism doesn’t operate like that? So you have far far less political representation than anyone in PRC but you want to yap about representation lmao? So you want to bring up the Uyghurs while the source for that is still crappy CIA propaganda and it’s actually about religious extremists that you otherwise lock up in Guantanamo when they turn against you? So you keep somehow siding with religious anti–freedom fanatics? So you’re so concerned about a state making sure that religious authorities don’t end up acting like a political Trojan horse while the West is constantly legislating censorship and repression and cracking down on demonstrations against real genocidal foreign policy and supporting genocidal colonial states? So you almost definitely have never done anything or even posted anything about the liberation of colonized Guam but yet you’re yapping about PRC being “imperialist” as if the Tibetans themselves aren’t part of their own administration? All I’m asking for is consistency!

I predict crickets like before. But let’s go deeper.

So you’re either clueless or a liar and don’t know that Chinese officials are literally all elected but you imagine who knows what sort of magical appointment by the ghost of Mao probably? So you’re almost definitely going to whine about lack of “legitimate” elections in the PRC because it’s a single party system as if having two parties that also vet and preapprove their candidates is better outside your propaganda? So you don’t know that all levels of government and the party itself are open and you don’t need millions to run unlike Murica, making them more democratic institutions because what you really want are pro-calitalist wreckers being allowed to run to turn China into a colony again so you can get cheaper goods in the west? So you clearly don’t care about nations (and not just ethnostates) having sovereignty because you want cheaper crap and global dominance for your side at the expense of everyone else? So westerners get to complain about supposedly other nations not having enough democracy while simultaneously complaining about their own parties stealing elections all the time lol?

I’ve got better ones.

So you complain about whataboutism when the Tibetan issue is literal whataboutism lmao?

Bestest one: So the only valid voices are religious extremists who support western propaganda ( and not the Chinese Han, Tibetans, Uyghurs etc who support their government because you know, they have healthcare, employment, religious freedom AND freedom FROM religion, womens’ rights and constantly increasing quality of life unlike the west that consistently loses all these things?

All I’m asking for is consistency.

Oh I forgot. So you either haven’t heard or pretend not to know about the oppressed fanatical jihadi Uyghurs active in Syria as Al Qaeda forces? So you’re saying that the PRC should embrace Al Qaeda because you clearly support and care about its members? We can talk about the Uyghurs all you want lol, it’s you who’ll dodge the subject.

So theocracy is okay? So feudalism and serfdom is okay? So not having any political representation is okay? So rule by religious elites and nobility is okay? So brainwashing children is okay? So suggesting that every nation should be an ethnostate otherwise it’s “oppression” is okay? So completely ignoring that Tibet is an autonomous region within China is okay? So ignoring that Tibet has a local government is okay? So acting like the Tibetans in the local government don’t count because they’re communists is okay? So implying that unelected “governments in exile” are automatically more legitimate is okay? So pretending that separatists are democratic and not a tool of Western imperialism (the real one) is okay? So making Charlie Kirk type arguments by distorting what imperialism and colonialism means and using definitions based on vibes and feels is okay? So lowkey wanting to expand western economic and political dominance in Asia and turn more regions into South Koreas is okay? So ignoring that the Dalai Lama himself recognizes Tibet as part of a multiethnic PRC (and Tibet itself is multiethnic) is okay? So crappy US propaganda is okay? So nitpicking and distorting PRC policies in edge cases while ignoring actual western imperialism and colonialism of currently real genocidal proportions is okay? All I’m asking for is consistency.

Want more? It’s not hard. Yes I’m sure you think that forcefully ending slavery in the USA for example “backfired” (you said invariably so it’s included) and that undermines any moral stance that abolitionists may once had because they weren’t gentle with the slave owners and didn’t “convince” them first. Sure buddy.

When is the USA going to grant full citizen rights to Guam, like the right to vote in presidential elections and representation in the Houses by the way? Guam independence when? Guam is far less incorporated into USA than Tibet is in PRC, with pretty much zero precedence of historical or cultural ties unlike Tibet.

So it’s okay to be a hypocrite? Consistency.

Never assume that mass downvoting in systems that allow up/down voting is organic when the subject matter is US foreign policy and stuff like articles that “thoughtfully” shit talk geopolitical adversaries. It’s just a cheap way for fake consensus building, fake peer pressure etc. Tibet was a theocratic feudal kingdom before China ended that garbage, the kind of system that would make the KKK salivate.

More like “Trust me bro I’m on the Iran desk at Eglin Airforce Base.” There are Iranians yapping on Facebook etc, even the critical ones don’t use US State Department lingo to refer to the Iranian government like “the mullahs” lol.

deleted by creator