NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte has acknowledged that some alliance members did not meet expectations set by the United States, amid ongoing tensions over burden-sharing
Oh for fucks sake, google it yourself, why is that in any way relevant?
Even if it never happened, it remains the purpose of NATO, because it will definitely happen if article 5 is called, and there is an actual country that is the enemy, and the only country to ever call article 5 was USA. But that was based on a terrorist attack, so a bit of a weird situation.
It’s relevant because you are the one making the claim that the triggering of Article V causes all the military to fall under the sole authority of the US.
I am trying to explains that it doesn’t. Even if Article V where triggered (let’s say Russia invades the Baltic’s) Eroupe would still retain command and ownership of their respective militaries.
And when was the last time such a deceleration happened
Oh for fucks sake, google it yourself, why is that in any way relevant?
Even if it never happened, it remains the purpose of NATO, because it will definitely happen if article 5 is called, and there is an actual country that is the enemy, and the only country to ever call article 5 was USA. But that was based on a terrorist attack, so a bit of a weird situation.
It’s relevant because you are the one making the claim that the triggering of Article V causes all the military to fall under the sole authority of the US.
I am trying to explains that it doesn’t. Even if Article V where triggered (let’s say Russia invades the Baltic’s) Eroupe would still retain command and ownership of their respective militaries.