RandAlThor@lemmy.ca to World News@lemmy.world · 1 year agoRichest 1% account for more carbon emissions than poorest 66%, report sayswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up12
arrow-up12external-linkRichest 1% account for more carbon emissions than poorest 66%, report sayswww.theguardian.comRandAlThor@lemmy.ca to World News@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square8fedilink
minus-squareEatATaco@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year ago eat better organic food A slight nit-pick here, but when it comes to greenhouse gas impact, organic food may be worse. It’s certainly not clearly better.
minus-squareGiveMemes@jlai.lulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoAlmost definitely worse lol. We have the option to modify the genome of the plants we eat in order to make then better in every way and still some people are like “no that’s icky because science”.
minus-squaresixCats@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoGMO != organic as far as I know?
minus-squareGiveMemes@jlai.lulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoIn the US organic means no GMOs as well according to usda
A slight nit-pick here, but when it comes to greenhouse gas impact, organic food may be worse. It’s certainly not clearly better.
Almost definitely worse lol. We have the option to modify the genome of the plants we eat in order to make then better in every way and still some people are like “no that’s icky because science”.
GMO != organic as far as I know?
In the US organic means no GMOs as well according to usda