“I was never swayed by NATO. I always knew they were a paper tiger, and Putin knows that too, by the way,” he said, in comments published Wednesday.

How’s that three day ‘special operation’ going? You should ask him the next time you call him. In his published comments on Wednesday, Trump again rebuked the U.K., suggesting that the country’s Royal Navy was inadequate.

" You don’t even have a navy. You’re too old and had aircraft carriers that didn’t work," he said.

  • CocaineShrimp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Isn’t “paper tiger” a phrase in Chinese? I don’t watch a lot of trump, but I don’t think I’ve ever heard him use that phrase…

    • rwrwefwef@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It’s a calque of Chinese. It has come to be used so often because of 1) its obvious meaning and 2) the increase in global wars.

  • Laser@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 hours ago

    If Putin knows NATO is a paper tiger, why is he complaining about countries joining it? Why does he complain about NATO member countries on Russia’s borders? Surely a paper tiger isn’t detrimental to his interests? Why did they claim Russia is fighting NATO in Ukraine?

    Total disconnect from reality

    • Bazell@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      These are childish provocations. NATO is not obligated to participate in a war started by one of its members without an agreement from the others. This only works if one of their members was attacked first.

      • Laser@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I totally know how NATO works (am former soldier from a NATO country), I know Mario is a defensive treaty and even if you’re a member it doesn’t mean other member nations have to cooperate with you outside of NATO related activities. So yes no NATO members need to join, and no NATO member has to support the US (even if just by allowing to use the air space) outside of NATO missions it exercises.

          • Laser@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            That swiping keyboard typo happens way more often to me than it doesn’t

        • Bazell@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I haven’t said that anyone should support the USA… I only stated that orange guy wants something that isn’t supposed to be.

  • Bazell@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Assuming how much conflicts the USA participates in now, it will be only an improvement to the overall stability and peace of the whole alliance.

  • webp@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 hours ago

    US president says he’s considering pulling ‘paper tiger’ U.S. out of NATO

    Rule of projection.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Someone told him what ‘paper tiger’ means, or he watched that old Alan Alda movie, 'The Paper Lion" and got it all screwed up in the translation.

  • zeppo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    18 hours ago

    My conservative neighbor said last week “when did he say he wanted us to leave NATO? He just wants them to pay their fair share!!”

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Then when he actually does leave NATO and your neighbor gets the updated talking points: “it’s good that he left NATO”

      • zeppo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        25 minutes ago

        I believe he already thinks that, something like “we don’t need them“. What I have asked him is who he thinks would benefit from the US leaving NATO. The US? No. Europe? No. Russia, China? Yes. Iran? Yes. So why would we be doing that?

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        12 hours ago

        The real reason mainstream media is so unwilling to condemn rightwing nonsense is that it’d break modern physics: Rightwing goalposts constitute a perpetual motion machine. It’s a global conspiracy by Big Thermodynamics.

    • Zorque@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Did they? Or did he just hear it a few times and thought it sounded like something he should say?

      • k0e3@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        He’s basically an LLM that’s running on a SoundBlaster card.

  • kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    We knew Trump would eff up the US’s economy, government, culture, and alliances. I think maybe we collectively underestimated how he and his zionist paymasters would screw up the entire world.

    Still 35 of 48 months in his term left to go too, assuming he steps down peacefully at the end of his term, which he says he wont.

    • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      17 hours ago

      When someone tells you who they are, believe them. Trump has told us who he is, very clearly and in no uncertain terms, and we’d better believe him. If the midterms actually go the way people are expecting them to go, I’ll eat a MAGA hat (while celebrating the democratic victory) but sadly, I think people are going to be disappointed/enraged.