On 5 March, a post appeared on the X account of Iran’s late supreme leader, Ali Khamenei, managed by his staff after he was killed in an Israeli airstrike on 28 February. The tweet featured a stark piece of propaganda: a gleaming, oversized missile arcing across the sky as a city below is engulfed in flames. The caption read: “Khorramshahr moments are on the horizon.”

The Khorramshahr missile, Iran’s most advanced ballistic missile, is believed to be capable of carrying a cluster warhead dispersing up to 80 submunitions. Since that post, it has come to loom large in Israeli threat assessments, a persistent concern for a country equipped with a multi-layered missile defence system that is widely regarded as the world’s most sophisticated.

The latest attack using cluster munitions occurred on Sunday, when an Iranian ballistic missile struck central Israel, injuring 15 people.

According to the Israel Defense Forces, roughly half of the missiles launched from Iran since the escalation have carried cluster warheads.

The Guardian, which reviewed the impact of dozens of Iranian strikes alongside statements from Israeli officials, has identified at least 19 ballistic missiles carrying cluster warheads that penetrated Israeli airspace and struck urban areas since the beginning of the war with Iran on 28 February. Those attacks have killed at least nine people and wounded dozens, reflecting a broader shift in Iran’s tactics that appears to have exposed a vulnerability in Israel’s air defences. Since the start of the war, Iran’s cluster munitions – which disperse dozens of bomblets mid-air – have tested Israel’s highly advanced, multi-tier missile defence network, including Iron Dome, which is designed to counter threats across ranges, altitudes and speeds, exposing gaps that interception alone has struggled to close.

  • couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Well Iran has been attacking them for decades through Hezbollah and Hamas. It’s not like they’ve been keeping to themselves playing Rummikub in this conflict

    • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Zionazi complaints for justifying Iran destruction must be dismissed, and certainly dismissed from world consideration of siding with Israel. Palestinian and Lebanese resistance to US/Israel hegemony over decades is justifiable independent resistance, and Iran support for any of it is irrelevant. That US/Israel are innocent loving victims of Iran must be exterminated from policy relevance. Let he who never supports political groups internationally cast the first stone.

      Most relevant, the US has been negotiating a peace deal with Iran for over a year. Such a deal, if earnest would forgive the past on both sides. That Israel will always prevent peace, and controls the US means it is not earnest. In this week’s negotiations, all US zionazi political stooges are all talking as though the negotiations are for Iran’s surrender with no budget to compensate Iran. Zionazi media doesn’t even ask the questions.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Iran has been arming resistance to Israeli colonialism for decades, but that does not in any way make Israel a victim. Palestinians and Lebanese have the right to defend themselves, and Iran has the right (and, like the rest of the world, moral duty) to help them defend themselves.

      • couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Can you explain how the Lebanese are defending themselves when they’re firing rockets over the border into Israel?

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Do… do you know why Hezbollah was even founded? For a hint, here’s a literal former Israeli PM on the topic:

          In 2006, former Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak stated, “When we entered Lebanon … there was no Hezbollah. We were accepted with perfumed rice and flowers by the Shia in the south. It was our presence there that created Hezbollah.”

          • couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Yeah, two reasons actually:

            1: beat back the Israeli’s (who invaded because the PLO was attacking them from Lebanon)

            2: to tilt the Lebanese civil war in favour of the Shia sect

            But neither seems like a valid reason to keep attacking Israel today

            • GuyIncognito@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Israel has been bombing and occupying part of Lebanon since the “ceasefire”, so your argument is ridiculous on the face of it. Hezbollah is also acting in accordance with internetional law with respect to the prevention of genocide. Finally, it does not count as “aggression” if you enter a defensive war against an aggressor - Britain and France were not aggressors in WW2 just because they declared war on Germany, since Germany had already started the war.

              • couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 hour ago

                Copying my other reply:

                Part of the ceasefire deal was Hezbollah disarming and staying north of the Litani river. Instead, they rearmed and rebuilt. Why would you only focus on the Israeli side of the ceasefire?

                • GuyIncognito@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 hour ago

                  No deal with Israel can be relied upon. They only understand force. I wish them a great many “difficult security situations”.

                  • couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    38 minutes ago

                    If your base premise is that Hezbollah should just be allowed to break a ceasefire deal, why would you bring it up? Can’t you see the irony?

            • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Your attempt to whitewash the Israeli invasion of Lebanon (brutal enough that even Reagan told them to dial it down) was not missed.

              But neither seems like a valid reason to keep attacking Israel today

              Are Israel’s near-daily ceasefire violations and its occupation of Lebanese territory reason enough?

              • couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 hour ago

                Part of the ceasefire deal was Hezbollah disarming and staying north of the Litani river. Instead, they rearmed and rebuilt. Why would you only focus on the Israeli side of the ceasefire?

        • GuyIncognito@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Just what is it that you find so appealing about genocide, fasicsm, and pedophilia? It boggles the mind.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          8 hours ago

          TF do you mean “apologist?” Hamas being a (and, in fact, by far the biggest) Palestinian armed resistance organization and the fact they do a lot of evil shit are two facts that can be true at the same time. That doesn’t mean supporting Hamas is victimizing Israel.

          • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            It kinda does tho. Hamas, in one form or another, has been attacking Isreal for many decades. Isreal has been attacking Gaza and Lebanon and other Arab countries for decades too. They’re all victims of each other and a product of an unfortunate history. There have even been some serious attempts at peaceful resolution, which always get fucked up by one side or the other, or usually both. Yes I 100% agree that isreal’s actions are unacceptable and horrific. But they are also victims. Just like the people of Gaza could have voted for a government that strived for a peaceful solution, but chose a violent one - but they are still victims of the result.

            • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Hamas, in one form or another, has been attacking Isreal for many decades.

              One doesn’t become a victim due to being attacked; it takes being unjustly attacked to make one a victim. This makes certain individual Israeli civilians victims, but not Israel as a whole.

              Just like the people of Gaza could have voted for a government that strived for a peaceful solution, but chose a violent one

              With all due respect, this is the most historically illiterate thing I’ve read today. The only reason Hamas even exists is the complete and utter failure of peaceful solutions. And of course they failed; what, did you also expect the Irish or Algerians to strive for peaceful solutions? Rejecting peaceful solutions has been Israeli policy for longer than Israel existed. Hell, the current state of the West Bank should tell you all you need to know about what “striving for peaceful solutions” looks like,.