• Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Want wasn’t it regean that made it a law you couldn’t buy directly from the manufacturer because he was buddies with people who owned major dealerships. And it just stuck since then.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Things like that and tariffs are absolutely useful tools for trade issues: TARGETED, TEMPORARY tools. There would have been nothing wrong with temporary protection for Harley Davidson if it were temporary, if there was a deadline where they have to start competing again.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Regulations were put in place to prevent manufacturers from opening their own stores right next to the dealers they worked with. Dealers assume some risk when they take on inventory. Apparently it’s not like a bookstore where any unsold copies just go back to the publisher. It’s still a flimsy justification though and enshrined these middlemen who then enshittified everything. Worse, in some cases manufacturers are entirely prevented from selling direct, even if they don’t work with dealerships. It’s too much.