Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy blasted his European allies Thursday for what he portrayed as the continent’s slow, fragmented and inadequate response to Russia’s invasion nearly four years ago and its continued international aggression.

Addressing the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Zelenskyy listed a litany of grievances and criticisms of Europe that he said have left Ukraine at the mercy of Russian President Vladimir Putin amid an ongoing U.S. push for a peace settlement.

  • Rothe@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Tankies are unsurprisingly regurgitating the same talking points as MAGA fascists. They are all on the same team.

    • Kühlschrank@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      They aren’t wrong though - the USSR got somewhere around $100-150B from Lend Lease. Ukraine has gotten something like $300B already.

      But it’s certainly not money laundering. Wars cost a lot in the modern age. The real question is why are countries giving so much but only to keep Ukraine from losing.

      It’s embarrassing for Russia that this war is now longer than their war against Germany in WWII but it’s also sort of embarrassing for Ukraine’s allies.

      EDIT: I was estimating in today’s dollars, from Wikipedia - A total of $50.1 billion (equivalent to $690 billion in 2024 when accounting for inflation) worth of supplies was shipped, or 17% of the total war expenditures of the U.S.[3] In all, $31.4 billion went to the United Kingdom, $11.3 billion to the Soviet Union, $3.2 billion to France, $1.6 billion to China, and the remaining $2.6 billion to other Allies.

      • mcv@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        8 hours ago

        The USSR also got a second front. Western allies were also fighting Germany, even if they could have easily stayed out of it. The EU knows some of their members are next on the Russian menu, and still they refuse to fight for their survival.

        I honestly think the EU can only win by helping Ukraine. Russia and the US see the EU as weak abd indecisive, which is why they think they can take advantage of it. If the EU shows itself to be strong and a major power in its own right, they’re likely to back off. Both Putin and Trump only respect strength and force, and Ukraine is the best opportunity for the EU to show that.

        On top of that, they’ll gain a valuable ally with the most effective and creative army in the world.

        There is too much to win for the EU, and nothing to lose. Just end this war by liberating Ukraine.

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          While I wholeheartedly agree, war is always a loss. And I think Russia is treading carefully knowing exactly what the West will allow. (And manipulating their biggest obstacle.)

          • mcv@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            You’re absolutely right. War costs everybody. That money would be better spent to improve people’s lives instead of destroying it. But when someone attacks you, not defending yourself may end up costing more. And helping (and gaining) an ally is better than losing them.

            But more than that: the EU showing its strength can discourage further aggression from Russia. And maybe the US.

      • Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Your whole framing is suspect, not to mention you’re talking finances and you can’t even figure out that $150 B (EDIT: as written in the post, when I posted this I didn’t check that the nominal figure really was) in 1944 dollars is closer to $2,800 B in 2025 dollars.

        $11.3 B in 1944 dollars is equal to $207 B in 2025 dollars.

        • Kühlschrank@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          It was in today’s dollars. See my edit. And I don’t think it is suspect to ask Ukraine’s allies to do more to help them actually win when Zelensky is saying it himself ad nauseam.

          • fort_burp@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            What does a win for Ukraine look like to you? Just wondering.

            And btw, from an outsider perspective it’s funny and cringe to see the attacks on your comment. I’m afraid those commenters don’t have wherewithal to be as embarrassed as they should be, but it’s a good point, that Ukraine has gotten a lot more outside funding (about $380 bn) than the USSR did to defeat Germany in WWII (about $250 bn in today’s $). I hadn’t noticed that.

            • Kühlschrank@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              I mean at this point I’m all in on Ukraine and I’m sorry to see my comment interpreted as anything but the hope that Ukraine could get the support they are asking for.

              I know peace deals are precarious and complicated, but I dream of nothing less than pre 2014 borders, the end of all Russian hostilities, and a defense pact, if not full inclusion, between Ukraine and the EU.

              • fort_burp@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                That would be nice, but what about the Minsk agreements? Just ignore them? Could they even be implemented at this stage?

        • Riverside@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          Edit: the commenter above (Skiluros) made up the $2.8tn figure by applying inflation to a commenter above saying that the USSR had received less money through lend-lease than Ukraine has since the invasion by Russia. This figure Is wrong because the original commenter was already discussing inflation-adjusted figures, and they refuse to correct the mistake.

          According to Wikipedia’s article on lend-lease, the USSR got $11.3bn, which today would roughly be $250bn. It’s higher than what Greg said (which I assumed was taking inflation into account, hence me cheking), but still lower than what Ukraine has gotten (assuming the $300bn is correct, didn’t fact check that).

          • Kühlschrank@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            I wasn’t refusing to correct the mistake, thanks. I just hadn’t checked my replies until now. I have made the edits now to clarify.

          • Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            I have no clue around the exact sum provided to the USSR (although I have read about the nature of the support and what it focused on). I am just pointing you can’t compare dollars in a nominal manner.

            • Riverside@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 hours ago

              You can compare dollars in a nominal manner if you apply inflation indices, that’s what inflation is calculated for. Why did you literally make up the numbers by assuming that it wasn’t inflation-adjusted instead of saying “you can’t compare dollars”?

                • Riverside@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  6 hours ago

                  So, you CAN compare dollars. You can just delete or edit your previous comment to eliminate the misinformation of $2800bn because you applied inflation twice on the original figure by (for some reason instead of checking it up) assuming Greg hadn’t applied it

                  • Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    6 hours ago

                    Ah, you’re a tankie who supports russian genocidal imperialism.

                    No, wonder you’re being so holier than thou.

                    Bye!

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Tell me you don’t understand how inflation works without telling me you don’t understand how inflation works

        Tell me you don’t understand geopolitical strategy around an expansionist nuclear state works without telling me you don’t understand how geopolitical strategy around an expansionist nuclear state works

        Tell me you have a reductive and naive view of history and current events without telling me you have a reductive and naive view of history and current events

        • Kühlschrank@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Though your snippy reply maybe doesn’t deserve it, respectfully- the figures I quoted were in today’s dollars. I guess I shouldn’t have assumed people would know that though.