But US can freely access their military bases. And US has their own military bases in Greenland. So who Greenland is going to shoot exactly? The airplanes flying to US bases in Greenland? The soldiers legally entering Danish military bases?
Also:
“When requested, the Danish Executive Agent shall make reasonable efforts to facilitate
temporary access to and use of private land and facilities (including roads, ports, and airfields),
and public land and facilities (including roads, ports, and airfields) that are not a part of an
Agreed Facility and Area, including those owned or controlled by Denmark or by local
authorities, by U.S. forces, U.S. contractors, and Danish contractors for use in support of U.S.
forces. U.S. forces, U.S. contractors, or Danish contractors shall not bear the cost of such
facilitation”
US can request access and Denmark has to facilitate it if possible. They can’t just deny it because they don’t feel like it. That’s the 2023 agreement.
“U.S. forces, U.S. contractors, Danish contractors, dependents, and others as mutually agreed
are authorized unimpeded access to and use of Agreed Facilities and Areas for visits; training;
exercises; maneuvers; transit; support and related activities; refueling of aircraft; bunkering of
vessels; landing and recovery of aircraft; temporary maintenance of vehicles, vessels, and
aircraft; accommodation of personnel; communications; staging and deploying of forces and
materiel; pre-positioning of equipment, supplies, and materiel; security assistance and
cooperation activities; joint and combined training activities; humanitarian and disaster relief
activities; contingency operations; construction in support of mutually agreed activities”
It’s generally agreed across the entire world that if you enter a contract with someone and that person breaks the terms of said contract, you are no longer beholden to those terms.
Please show me the part of US-Denmark agreement that says US will stop saying that it should control Greenland. Because international agreement are based on written laws, not feelings.
no, all agreements with the US can be ignored, since the US has already decided and shown it will do whatever it wants regardless of existing agreements / laws
They have to request the use of private land and obviously most of Greenland and Denmark is not a US military base.
But US can freely access their military bases. And US has their own military bases in Greenland. So who Greenland is going to shoot exactly? The airplanes flying to US bases in Greenland? The soldiers legally entering Danish military bases?
Also:
“When requested, the Danish Executive Agent shall make reasonable efforts to facilitate temporary access to and use of private land and facilities (including roads, ports, and airfields), and public land and facilities (including roads, ports, and airfields) that are not a part of an Agreed Facility and Area, including those owned or controlled by Denmark or by local authorities, by U.S. forces, U.S. contractors, and Danish contractors for use in support of U.S. forces. U.S. forces, U.S. contractors, or Danish contractors shall not bear the cost of such facilitation”
US can request access and Denmark has to facilitate it if possible. They can’t just deny it because they don’t feel like it. That’s the 2023 agreement.
https://www.fmn.dk/globalassets/fmn/dokumenter/nyheder/2023/-us-denmark-dca-den-prime-english-20dec2023-.pdf
“U.S. forces, U.S. contractors, Danish contractors, dependents, and others as mutually agreed are authorized unimpeded access to and use of Agreed Facilities and Areas for visits; training; exercises; maneuvers; transit; support and related activities; refueling of aircraft; bunkering of vessels; landing and recovery of aircraft; temporary maintenance of vehicles, vessels, and aircraft; accommodation of personnel; communications; staging and deploying of forces and materiel; pre-positioning of equipment, supplies, and materiel; security assistance and cooperation activities; joint and combined training activities; humanitarian and disaster relief activities; contingency operations; construction in support of mutually agreed activities”
agreements with the US don’t mean shit anymore, the US has shown that. everything is null.
So we should just declare all international laws null? Yeah, that’s a great idea.
It’s generally agreed across the entire world that if you enter a contract with someone and that person breaks the terms of said contract, you are no longer beholden to those terms.
Please show me the part of US-Denmark agreement that says US will stop saying that it should control Greenland. Because international agreement are based on written laws, not feelings.
no, all agreements with the US can be ignored, since the US has already decided and shown it will do whatever it wants regardless of existing agreements / laws
I assume these things are authorized or announced in some way. If paratroops start falling or landing craft are launched that’s a good indicator.