Fans suspect cover elements of new illustrated edition of ‘A Feast for Crows’ generated with AI

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    shield
    M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    20 hours ago

    This is really on the line for world news.

    American author, American artist, the only thing that barely qualifies it here is the Penguin half of Penguin/Random House is a UK Publisher and the conglomerate itself is owned out of Germany.

    Allowing it for now, but it’s right on the line.

    • nogooduser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Would you not consider an author who sold millions of books worldwide to be qualification enough for world news?

      As a non American I wouldn’t mind articles about American authors in world news. It would have to be those with a high international profile though which gives the problem about where the line is.

      • scarabic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        Agreed. It is highly reductive to refer to GRRM merely as “American author.” His works have been translated into over 45 languages, and he has won award in (at least) England, Ireland, France, Spain, Russia, Japan, and Finland, not to mention multiple wins from highly international completions like the Hugo and Nebula awards, the International Horror Guild, and Time Magazine’s list of the 100 most influential people in the world. He is one of the most popular authors of all time and if there is a line where someone crosses over into international relevance, we could debate where that line is, but there should be absolutely no doubt that he is far past it.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Tangentially:

    George RR Martin says he is three quarters of the way through The Winds of Winter

    George RR Martin is asymptotically approaching the completion of the next book in the series, while simultaneously aging in linear time, which presents fairly obvious problems.

    • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      22 hours ago

      He should finish up what he’s already got by writing “Actually I just don’t care anymore. The End” and leave the last quarter of the book blank pages. Probably better than anything else he’s going to come up with at this point, and as a bonus it will fit perfectly with the ending of the show.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        17 hours ago

        https://www.workableweb.com/_pages/tips_how_to_write_good.htm

        All too often, the budding author finds that his tale has run its course and yet he sees no way to satisfactorily end it, or, in literary parlance, “wrap it up.” Observe how easily I resolve this problem:

        Suddenly, everyone was run over by a truck.
        -the end-

        If the story happens to be set in England, use the same ending, slightly modified:

        Suddenly, everyone was run over by a lorry.
        -the end-

        If set in France:

        Soudainement, tout le monde etait écrasé par un camion.
        -finis-

        You’ll be surprised at how many different settings and situations this ending applies to. For instance, if you were writing a story about ants, it would end “Suddenly, everyone was run over by a centipede.” In fact, this is the only ending you ever need use.¹

        ¹ Warning - if you are writing a story about trucks, do not have the trucks run over by a truck. Have the trucks run over by a mammoth truck.

  • HeyJoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    21 hours ago

    This timeline sucks… we really have to answer to people who suspect something may be AI now because it’s too hard to tell sometimes? I kind of wish I was an artist, I would be adding extra fingers to everything just to get a reaction.

    • the_q@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      21 hours ago

      So in your opinion the problem is people worrying about something being AI generated and not the continued use and force feeding of AI into every aspect of life by corps feeding one another into an economic and ecological disaster? Hmm?

      • HeyJoe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        21 hours ago

        No, my problem is that we are at the point where we probably need to put labels on everything to officially certify it’s not AI. Otherwise, everyone will just claim its AI.

        Obviously, if the choice was no AI at all, then, of course, that should be the standard, but that’s never going to happen ever again.

        • njm1314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Why is that a problem? AI having to come with labels sounds great. It’s both an obvious good and an obviously correct step to take. In a world with leaders who we’re worth anything it would have happened immediately. The second deep fakes became possible an intelligent society would have immediately said all AI production has to be labeled.

          • HeyJoe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            So do only AI pics come with watermarks or do all things now need to come with a real and not real label. You pick up a book, and it has a label across the cover saying not generated by AI. Will there be a board created for people to certify its authenticity? Will that now cost people extra to have this verified? Yeah, that sounds great. Instead of simplifying things, it sounds like it just gets harder and harder like usual.

            • njm1314@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              17 hours ago

              Why would you need a “not AI” label? Your argument is approaching absurdity. If something is produced by AI it should come labeled. 100% no exceptions. It’s not difficult.

              • HeyJoe@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                14 hours ago

                This article is about people not believing the cover is real. You think as soon as you start labeling just AI pics people won’t just assume the ones that aren’t weren’t lying without being verified? And yeah, it is absurd, but if you really believe people won’t think that way, then I guess you have more faith in them than I do.

                • njm1314@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  13 hours ago

                  Oh I have one. Since stupid people exist why have laws at all. Why not allow people to marry dogs. Am I playing the game right?

  • tankplanker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    19 hours ago

    If I remember correctly they were doing an illustrated version of the book each year and then the series got delayed because they fell out with the orginal illustrator.

    So it would make sense that this one would be shit, because even if its not AI errors like this are basic shit to get right, because I believe the dispute was over money.

  • Diddlydee@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Cool and all, but no thanks.

    Finish the goddamned series we’ve been waiting decades for.