His last words were “Counting or not counting gang violence?” when asked about mass shootings. He died as he lived, spewing bullshit.
Charlie was a hateful, bigoted piece of shit. You can’t rewrite history.
Imagine having the balls to debate him on it
I’ll tell it to him when I piss on his grave
I mean, you probably are used to pulling your penis out in areas where mothers and children walk dogs
You don’t need balls to debate a brick wall. He’s actually a more honest debater now than he was 2 days ago.
Bravo my guy, so cool, Please keep elaborating, you seem likea totally reasonable dude and not totally unhinged to normal people
I don’t think someone calling Charlie Kirk a non hateful person is at all in a position to be a judge of any other person’s character. Continue the sarcastic condescension though, it’s not like you have an actual argument. I’m not surprised you idolize this guy.
I didn’t actually idolize the guy, I didn’t agree with many of his views, I don’t agree with evangelical Christian views on homosexuality, and I have no problem with gay marriage. And although as a conservative I voted for Trump I don’t like that Trump is shilling for Israel. I have several disagreements with Charlie Kirk, Donald Trump and the Republican Party in general just like I have several disagreements with the Democrats. But you won’t see me on a rooftop carving swastikas into bullets and taking out Michael Tyler Cohen or Hassan Piker anytime soon
And? You voted for a felon insurrectionist and you’re holding water for a hate spewing propagandist. You say that you don’t agree with homophobic attitudes, yet you are enabling the most homophobic, transphobic, xenophobic, and racist regime that has existed in decades. Just because you aren’t carving swastikas into bullets doesn’t mean that you aren’t complicit in the absurd levels of cruelty being perpetrated by the modern right wing.
Don’t forget rapist. White male supremacist.
I feel like we could have a good conversation at a Starbucks or something, I’ll tell you what, if you’re ever in the central Massachusetts area, dm me and I’ll buy you lunch and we’ll talk, tone gets lost online sometimes and at the end of the day, I’ll show you the turtle boy statue in Worcester where it looks like a naked man is raping a turtle, and we can both have a good laugh
He also lashed out at the gay community, denouncing what he called the “LGBTQ agenda,” expressing opposition to same-sex marriage and suggesting that the Bible verse Leviticus 20:13, which endorses the execution of homosexuals, serves as “God’s perfect law when it comes to sexual matters.”
Hey, so what’s the counterpoint to “kill homosexuals”? How do I debate him on this?
Debate him on it then, imagine like taking it out rather than putting a bullet in his head, I’m a conservative but I’m no Bible thumper, i believe in God though and get into it on religion at times with people
Hey “snatchdaddy” — guess what? The killer was a groyper.
Why won’t the right, you know, debate people with words instead of putting a bullet in the head of everyone they disagree with?
I read he was a leftist in a family of republicans
Whatever you need to tell yourself, chief.
https://www.thecanary.co/trending/2025/09/12/charlie-kirk-suspect-is-a-gun-loving-trump-supporter/
He carved hey fascist catch into bullets and other left leaning catch phrases
Apparently they were groyper phrases.
But, you know, keep pretending.
I could show you articles from today
Read the community note on the poster in the story. It’s not the same Tyler Robinson https://x.com/adamscochran/status/1966534558175646133/photo/1
https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/fact-check-charlie-kirk-shooter-never-donated-to-trump-campaign/
You obviously didn’t read the story I linked to.
Then how do I know you’re leaning on Adam Cochran’s “investigation”?
There’s no debating a threat to kill 10% of the population for simply existing.
You really think you’re cooking with the “put a bullet in his head” straw man when we don’t even have a conviction, never mind the killer’s manifesto.
And if the killer is a leftist (statistically unlikely) how does that relate to me? I don’t advocate killing anyone. Unlike your boy Charlie, who
iswas a stochastic terrorist.Do you really think that the American public is going to endorse a political candidate that would say hey by the way, we need to kill 10% of the American public. Charlie Kirk was friends with Scott Pressler, who is a known conservative, gay man as well as milo and the treasury secretary, Scott bissent. I personally don’t have a problem with anyone that’s gay, trans or whatever. It honestly doesn’t matter to me. Charlie was a devout Christian and had his views on homosexuality and such, but let me ask you a question. Would you be just as critical of a Muslim imam saying basically the same things? Or how about in certain Muslim areas where they actively hunt down and kill gay people? If the answer is now, it seems like your cherry picking.
Some of his best friends are gay! Well then, he’s just a liar? Or does he kind of want them stoned to death?
To answer your first question, sadly.
And for your last question, Christian fascists are labeled “the American Taliban” because they’re similarly violent hateful misogynistic homophobic fundamentalists.
What kind of point did you think you were making? Suddenly I’d melt trying to defend one religious zealot but not another?
This is the problem with America. Everyone sees reality through the filter of sports — my team good, their team bad. Too busy chanting death to the other team to understand rational, sensible people who say the game sucks.
I think it’s worth it to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the second amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational.
– Event organized by TPUSA Faith, the religious arm of Kirk’s conservative group Turning Point USA, on 5 April 2023
I agree with him on that however I would say that leaving schools Anna universities as soft targets is idiotic, with so many veterans in America why not just pay a couple veterans per school ,university etc. And give them like a spare room with a decent camera system and arm them to only respond to violent threats to the school. Just my suggestion.
So you’re saying one death on Wednesday is a small price to pay for 2a?
Sorry for the long comment, I’m saying that the second amendment is worth keeping but at the same time we could stop school shootings very easily with veterans in school, if we’re talking gang violence in the streets like how every weekend 20 people die in Chicago, maybe if the local mayors and DAs actually gave a fuck and cracked down on crime putting away the most violent offenders for long sentences. Maybe this shit would stop. I want sauce stat that if you take out the major cities and go to the Republican areas in the country sides in the suburbs and such the crime rate in America is much lower. I truly believe it’s time to crack down on crime in major cities and it’s not like the good people in those cities don’t want help from the police to stop all the bad behavior from what is most likely a very small percentage of the city.
20 people die in a weekend in Chicago because there are millions of people in Chicago. As a percent, you’re far safer there than in any red area. E.g. 3.2/100,000 gun deaths in Massachusetts, but it’s ten times higher in blood red Mississippi.
300 cops in Uvalde couldn’t do anything against a teen with a rifle except wet themselves. What’s a Korean War vet with a M1 garand going to do that hundreds of currently employed tacticool police couldn’t do?
Every other country has figured this out. Sorry if you don’t like the solution to the problem, but we’ve tried everything else. Especially ignoring it.
My other argument towards you, is this, we need a game plan that is realistic and getting rid of the second amendment is not going to happen anytime soon in the United States, it just fucking won’t. Getting rid of the Second Amendment is a pipe dream of Democrats.
Go far enough left and keep your guns but mental health seriously needs real spending, real solutions that are actually enacted. Fully funded, comprehensive health care, including mental, would solve most of our problems. Not overnight. But I guess within five years, the results would be astounding.
I support bringing back mental institutions like they had in the old days but with modern over recite so that we don’t see the same abuse as before
Only worked for Australia and every other country that tried.
Keep sticking your head in the sand, though. That’ll bring back those two kids who died in Colorado on Wednesday.
300 cops in Uvalde couldn’t do anything against a teen with a rifle except wet themselves
Those cops were absolute cowards
What’s a Korean War vet with a M1 garand going to do that hundreds of currently employed tacticool police couldn’t do?
First of all the Korean war was 75 years ago I don’t think 100 year-old man is gonna be guarding a school anytime soon. Second of all the idea that there are people in that school that would act would deter most people, and I think that it would make a difference vs needing someone to call the police and then a slow response time with pussy cops, waiting for orders from their chief of police who’s busy eating a doughnut and taking a shit
I think we’ll end with your “no true Scotsman.”
Good night.
