That’s what I thought too, but wouldn’t it be mentioned somewhere in the article? Like a line saying:

“The city government plans to demolish the bridge due to risk of collapse.”

But why though?

Blind serbian nationalism would be my guess but there seems to be more. Why now and why dismantle a working bridge without replacement?

Germany shut the remaining two or three down. The others were shut down years ago, some in the 2000s others in the 2010s and replaced with renewables and gas power plants.

When the remaining one’s were axed, they barely provided 2% of yearly power.

Not necessarily, bombs that don’t explode usually land on very soft ground - presumably the hole closed itself on top of the bomb right as it buried itself in.

Banning a party has significant affects on far-right organizations and money-streams. Much of their propaganda will become impossible to finance and any successor parties are automatically banned as well. Fascist voters cannot become disillusioned without a ban. Their beliefs are as solid as a flat-earther or anti-vaxer and only destroying their echo chamber has a chance to take them out.

In the article from de Volksrant

According to The Last Resort, the woman paid nothing for the Sarco, with the exception of 18 Swiss francs for the nitrogen tank and her funeral costs. ‘Using the Sarco is free’, Stewart states. ‘That is part of our philosophy. We don’t want to make any money on this. ’

For those unaware of German politics, the S is for decoration purposes only, because “Party of Germany” sounds silly.

Only scientists working for Russian/Belarusian institutions are banned. Russian and Belarusian scientists working for other institutions aren’t banned.

Fuck scientific institutions in fascist states, I’d support it if it applied to Israeli institutions too.

How and whether preschool exists differs from country to country.

For example, here in Germany you go straight from kindergarten to primary school.

Large collateral damage is a percentage.

An attack that targets and harms mostly combatants with little collateral damage is not indiscriminate. I’m curious what the ratio of combatants to noncombatants is before arguing whether this attack was a war crime.

Like the previous N times? 😴

Everyone is so afraid

The anti-Trump, let’s hope these two won’t collide

Yeah, that does make Churchill a genocidal British imperialist but not an autocrat.

Not that that’s any better - but the original comment claimed not holding elections in tines of war => autocracy.

I don’t really know about other democratic nations in WW2 that suspended elections - like 3/4 of Europe had their governments dissolved and couldn’t quite hold elections.

Pearl Harbor is not a city, is it?

I’ve checked nearly every single link from Wikipedia in that list, there were a handful of attacks on American villages. Not a single city was ever attacked (except for maybe Washigton by the Brits) - or rather seriously attacked.

I don’t really take

Casualties:

• 1 death
• 3 wounded
• damaged bridge

seriously, considering that attacks on cities usually end horribly for civilians.

Fair enough

But during WW2 Britain didn’t hold elections. Did this turn Britain into an autocracy?

And by the way, you literally can’t hold elections if the aggressor is certain to attack polling stations. The US never had this threat, neither during the Civil War nor during WW2. Not a single US city was ever attacked by an enemy nation.

Ships should suffice with a 100 kB/s connection which already existed before Starlink. You don’t usually need to send tons of data.

Additionally, Starlink is currently only offered to a single island nation without submarine fibre-optic cable, the Easter Islands. Although they may get submarine fibre somewhere after 2026 anyways because that is when a new cable will be laid closeby.

When do you need faster ocean communication, besides luxury? Nobody is owned fast internet on an environment-destroying luxury cruiseship.

Oh you mean server-side encryption? I’m fairly certain that Telegram is already handing out these keys anyway, since every country has laws regarding that. Server-side encryption is worth jack shit

What decryption keys even, group chats cannot be encrypted and private chats are unencrypted by default and even encrypted chats shouldn’t have the encryption key stored on any servers unless there is a backdoor.