Came across this post today. https://bsky.app/profile/kojamf.bsky.social/post/3ltav35egbs2q
How would you classify this? I know it to be fake, but its created to make a point. But its good enough that someone could be fooled intl believing it was real, no?
I hear you, but this is subjective and not objective. A bad faith actor, presumably an authoritarian government, can exploit laws like this to advance their agenda. “Yes, I was definitely convinced that was George HW Bush”.
Subjective judgements are ripe for abuse of power, sadly.
It’s a slippery slope from something that is otherwise well intentioned.
Define what a deep fake is over a parody or other political commentary.
I’ll offer a near miss.
Chat amongst colleagues over a coffee, the topic was something very normal and mundane: how lazy are we about cooking.
My colleague Carol said, “sometimes I just throw some chicken nuggets in the toaster because I don’t care or have the energy”
My response I intercepted between the brain and mouth: “living the bachelor lifestyle, carol?”
Carol’s husband had died quite suddenly 6 months prior. I didn’t fuck up, but I almost did and it haunts me still over a decade later.
My situation is I have an ability to recall a lot of really old information and some of it seemingly mundane. I can also synthesize all this together to make a good decision quickly.
This is basically what learning is, but it’s a broader base I can pull from and the process is just faster.
I don’t do well with forcing specific information to be cataloged. This means I wasn’t a great student in classes where you needed to just remember things (eg history).
The other thing I’ve got going for me is being able to visually see things in my head. It might be memories, but it’s also things for solving problems like this https://www.intelligencetest.com/questions/visualization/medium/3/8.html
I’m gonna fuck a waffle, marry pancakes, and kill french toast.
Like who even invited french toast to breakfast.
Yeah it’s really there to guide how fucked up it can be and not really be mega prescriptive. It’s not like quantities are on there, either.
Ideally a fire department shows up, sees the signs and then gets in contact with the building owner to start being more specific about what’s ahead of them before they just start dumping a ton of water on the building.
Section 4.2.3.3 of NFPA 704 guides how to handle multiple chemicals.
You can combine the worst of each category into a composite, list each individually, or do a hybrid option.
The posts saying there are two chemicals are true but likely incomplete… There are probably several different chemicals and they decided to go with the hybrid method.
My guess is that they combined the worst rating of everything that doesn’t need special handling, and have a stand alone for the chemical that is incompatible with water (or even combined for several chemicals that are incompatible with water).
All of the labels in these stores are e-ink displays.
Further, there actually are shelves with American goods, but surprisingly, goods that come from outside the EU are not limited to the US…
deleted by creator
Discussions on retaining ISK over the euro are not based on how difficult it is to swap the currency or change systems that use cash.
It’s about retaining control over monetary policy, which is centrally decided in the eurozone.
They can paint on the old mink farms
Imagine you’re a deer bear. You’re prancing along, you get thirsty, you spot a little brook, you put your little deer bear lips down to the cool clear water… BAM! A fuckin bullet rips off part of your head!
Oh no think of all the taxes they suddenly won’t be paying.
/S
You would make a great bot parent one day.
And then everyone clapped