That’s still not it, though. Extracting maximum revenue is just the default state for all things in capitalism, so it is not a qualifier or distinction that is useful to identify enshitification.
Enshitification is a model specifically for platforms. It’s not enshitification if it isn’t a platform; that’s just sparkling greed.
Forgejo is the way
There’s nothing illegal about using Tor, which was developed and published by the US Navy and supported by the US State Department. Like other users have said, this is not an exit node which is the only type of node that I would be concerned about running.
Definitely look into I2P which, in a nutshell, is a peer-to-peer version of Tor. Hosting an I2P router comes with no legal risk, too. Hosting an I2P outproxy would be similar to hosting a Tor exit node, so be aware of that.
Odd it’s not the guys who should be removed for being assholes to girls though.
Can you quote where I made this claim, please?
No, actually I’ve provided the solution to the problem. You just didn’t like it.
So just quitting the entire Internet wouldn’t help in the slightest.
help
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/help
slightest
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/slightest
So not voluntarily subjecting herself to internet abuse would …not… improve the situation in at least the smallest way? Are you sure?
Yeah I’ve already read it. Feel free to use the report button however you choose, though. That’s what it is there for!
Looks like you’ve mistakenly replied to the wrong comment. Which is ironic because… try reading? With your eyes?
Lol proves my point.
Okay, so tell that to the parents. It is their responsibility.
This isn’t realistic to tell a kid who uses social media, it’s like saying “Don’t play Xbox” or “Don’t watch new releases, only watch stuff that’s out on video already”
Do these kids just not have parents or adult guardians?
Woman: I keep getting catcalled on the street and it’s disturbing my sense of safety.
OpenStars: stop going outside, easy.
False equivalency. Going outside is not similar to using Instagram.
a large share of “incel adjacent” shut-ins, as they are the segment most likely to keep a forum or website active
“But not me, I’m different even though I’m here too!”
This user:
The identity verification debate is the point and it is the only reason this article exists in the first place.
These commercial algorithms are harmful for everybody.
Also true.
We gotta stop this Lemmy from forcing her to do all that
No, this is a propaganda article designed to push the narrative that the internet requires identity verification in order to “protect the children” and was written by an adult. Don’t be stupid.
“I want to go out of my way to communicate with literally any random stranger from anywhere on the planet, sorted in a way that shows me the most controversial, sexual, and enraging content first, but also these random strangers should have to behave and talk the way I want that makes me feel comfortable”
???
Like yeah, it would be great if everyone held hands and sang kumbaya and were nice to each other. But you’re choosing to go to the public internet forum that is designed to maximize and amplify the shittiest opinions. Perhaps, stop making that choice?
I know this girl is just a child so this is really a parenting failure. Stop allowing your kids to communicate with literally any and every random stranger across the globe.
Of course, this article only exists as propaganda to push a narrative that the internet requires identity verification so that we can “protect kids” by not actually doing any parenting and instead monitor and track all other individuals on the internet.
Save face? It’s probably a hundredth of the troops that would be required for any kind of real success in Iran. God forbid.