He has followers.
Just, wow.
He has followers.
Just, wow.
As an American
[X] Doubt
Plus a little state sponsored travel, for a treat!
My guess is that Ukraine is not inentionally targeting civilians, which is a significant difference.
You say it like it is a bad thing to acknowledge that people have differences in their biology.
Where did I say anyone tested her?
I haven’t seen any evidence that you aren’t a Russian bot.
To be fair, the Russians making the accusations are also malicious.
“Higher than average.” Hence the upper body muscles being larger that average for a female boxer.
It isn’t rocket surgery.
She is a woman who was born a woman and happens to have high testosterone for a woman, just like some people are taller than others. She just happens to be at one end of the testosterone spectrum.
Just because you want baseless rumors to be true doesn’t make them true.
Nuclear bombs would have fallout that blows across Europe.
Ukraine doesn’t need to defend any territory it has taken, it just needs to be a constant thorn in Russia’s side.
Of course, if Putin drops a tactical nuke inside of Russia’s internationally-recognized boarders, will the world care?
Yes, they will care about nuclear fallout blowing across Europe at a minimum.
Yeah, I assume this is a dual purpose morale booster and demoralizerm Ukraine shows that Russias defenses are a paper tiger because they relied on threats and it will force Russia to respond with troops, either by pulling from the front lines or reinforcements. Either way it moves the fighting to Russian land and that will demoralize support in Russia.
Plus they can disrupt more supply lines and war manufacturing locations by going around the border defenses. They don’t even need to hold ground, just be a thorn in Russia’s side.
So basically the same quality defenses that rolled over when the Wagner guy started his march to Moscow…
Don’t forget the military rape culture!
People might try to dismiss this as “of couree they would say that even if it wasn’t true” to cast doubt, but every time I have heard about alleged torture during war & other violent conflicts the allegations are substantiated. Often it is even worse than the allegations that make it to headlines.
Just a little gender supporting hair care.
Being factual and having an agenda are two separate things.
People question the ability for it to be objective due to it being created and run by a single person combined with being an automated process that implies it is authoritative in the context of the communities where the bot is automated.
I think MBFC is about as good as is available, kind of like Snopes. Both have a history of trying to be objective even if they aren’t perfect.
The news loves to focus on individual Israeli hostages and victims by providing backgrounds and what they do for a living, but for the most part just lists Palestinian deaths by numbers and only occasionally includes names or family relationships.
There is one news agency, I think the BBC, which used the phrase “unprecedented attack” to refer to the Oct atrocity that kicked off the current hostilities but doesn’t use any similar phrasing for the IDF killing many times more civilians as a response. So apparently genocide doesn’t need called out in a similar fashion because it is apparently not unprecedented.