This is exactly the point. They are already at full throttle war with the West. The only further escalation they could make would be nukes, which would be their end, NATO can take out all of Russias nuclear capacity and win the war in Ukraine all with conventional weapons.
Ah, should have checked the instance before bothering. Wasting my time on conversations with .ml bots again.
Russia’s inflation is among the highest in the world, interest rates are also at the level of credit cards elsewhere in the world, China’s banks are refusing to take Roubles now, Putin is burning through the sovereign wealth fund. They definitely do something. If maintained, they can provide some of the biggest headwinds to the war outside of simply providing tons of weapons to Ukraine. They just aren’t the instant fix that many people expect them to be.
That’s great, got any?
Ah that’s new case then. They have to evaluate each one and decide what’s safest then, my point being that sometimes the safest thing to do is to not shoot it down.
As they are flying through the airspace back into Ukraine, they don’t want to shoot them down in the risk that they fall on something in their country instead.
This would be a great sitcom.
That would be hilarious if they arrested Putin but he just continued ruling the country from Moscow.
.ml is leaking again
Great way to get new meat for the meat grinder.
Sounds like it doesn’t really work though.
Wouldn’t you not want to tell them you have one so that they keep wasting energy and manpower thinking it works?
Does that include storm shadow missles?
It’s twice what any independent reports are saying, but even 500 is more than everything Russia conquered in the last few months.
Yes my point was that “guilty mind” alone shouldn’t be enough to charge you with a crime.
I’m okay with this phrase except for the word “intent”. If we give someone the power to try to assess our intent, it can easily go the way of totalitarian states where they say you have a bad intent any time you criticize the government.
You should be punished for outcome, not intent. If you say something provably untrue that results in riots or murders, you should be held accountable for the outcomes of those statements. This is not that different from our current libel laws.
There seems to be little credible hard evidence on either side, so anyone claiming to know the real truth here is just talking out of their ass.
They are literally all in branches of this thread. I’m not going to keep answering the same questions over and over (many of which I already answered for you specifically).
Also covered under the threads spawning from this parent thread. I’m starting to feel trolled here, so please just read the comments under this parent thread, I’ve answered all your points already.
Unfortunately you can’t really turn off a nuclear reactor.