I acknowledge the downvotes without any discourse. If you’d like to see how this actually unfolded, here’s some context.

I’m curious to see how proponents of this behaviour would support the other side of the aisle perform similar theatrics.

It’s okay, folks, the IDF investigated and found “no civilians were killed.”

Burning down the houses of parliament would also suspend voting on the bill. Do the ends justify the means?

I’m eager to see how this community will support the conservatives when they loudly disrupt the debate chamber and silence the Maori members of parliament, now the precedent has been set that this is acceptable behavior.

This comment is unrelated to my position. (Which, for what it’s worth, is in favor of the Maori.)

The bill is now suspended; is the strategy to keep performing hakas to continuously silence members of parliament? The risk is that the next time, when the opposition wants to influence a bill, they also create a circus in the debate chamber. That is not a democratic process.

There are many enjoyable things that are not appropriate to do in parliament.

While I personally don’t see how performing haka is constructive to include in a debate about the bill, I think it’s unrelated to the discussion about what is or is not appropriate in the debating chamber.

Really? Who am I?

It’s the toxic cesspool of the anonymous internet. All these communities are the same.

The most ludicrous part of Idiocracy is that the film makers thought the future it depicted would be 500 years away. Turns out, it was 20 years.

Ah yes, the good ol’ retirement pyramid scheme. What could possibly go wrong, so long as we create more and more and more and more humans at an infinitely exponential rate?

Now it’s up to the justice department to obtain details about shorts made prior to the tariff war and investments made prior to the reconciliation so they can prosecute anybody who performed blatant market manipulation.

Having civilized discourse on a topic is not childish. I’m sorry you feel that way.

If you take an article title directly from a local newspaper and post it verbatim on World News, nobody will know what the fuck it’s about and regardless of its content, it won’t see the light of day. It’s important that the article title is relevant to the audience.

Unsubscribe button is right there, buddy.

That’s not so strange, considering 6 hours ago it was 02:00 CEST.

They also have a dominant position in the global supply chain for raw materials like cobalt and lithium. Good luck developing that EV industry in the US.

This really speaks volumes to how little people care about where their food comes from.

The amount of meat, for example, that is just thrown away sickens me. As if it’s not bad enough that we farm animals in deplorable conditions, we kill them so they can be thrown straight into the trash.

Sometimes, when I am reminded of the plague our species is upon this planet, I just can’t care about keeping homo sapiens sapiens from going extinct.

I’m not sure why you’ve chosen to be obtuse and misinterpret my comments. I’ve not said that Chichen Itzá should become a library.

The Vatican and Pisa are actually terrific examples of sites that are not overrun with tour guide and market stand mafias running every tourist scam under the sun.

So that’s it? We concede that this is the acceptable way we as a species best want to present our anthropological heritage? Forgive my comments on how we can strive to do better.

Good grief, this is such a toxic community.