

If you work with our enemies, we’ll punch ourselves right in the face! That’ll teach you!


If you work with our enemies, we’ll punch ourselves right in the face! That’ll teach you!


The only news here is that it didn’t explode on the launch pad like Russian missiles have been recently doing.


These satellites are designed to fully burn up on reentry. There is effectively zero chance of that.
On the flip side, the aerosols created by burning satellites destroy the ozone layer.


Being bright or not has nothing to do with it. Both intelligent people and less-intelligent people have excellent reasons to hate Musk.
Regardless of that, Falcon 9 is exceptionally reliable.


What are you on about? Crew Dragon might be the most reliable ride to space ever.
All of SpaceX’s bullshit with Starship is completely separate from Dragon/Falcon9.


Humans are primarily visual creatures, so we can detect the slop in AI images a LOT faster than we can in audio.
Human artists are going to have to get a lot weirder to out-innovate AI music, and I’m actually happy about that. Weird music is the best.


If they leave immediately in shame like they just did, then yeah, leave them alone. FFS you guys have no concept of diplomacy.


Generally unwise to escalate on stupidity. Don’t give the US any more reasons to double down on war.


Mexico doesn’t have nukes, but yes.


The problem is that the rich own all the lawyers. And judges. And congresspeople.


I wouldn’t exactly call this a PR piece:
But the New York Times reported that the foundation fell short of the amount it was required to give away for three years in a row. The paper, which saw the foundation’s tax filings, also found that many of its donations went to organisations with links to Musk.
Maybe they could hit harder but this article makes him look like a stereotypical selfish rich man.


the extension of the points-based system comes amid warnings that increasing reliance on drone warfare is not something Nato countries should follow because Russian defences against such unmanned aerial attacks have become formidable
And right, good point. NATO should definitely just ignore the most effective weapon of the era. 🙄


Storm of the century, so far.


Even if they were, it’s not okay to murder people. You could just stop their boat and arrest them.


I mean, any break from Daddy Putin is shocking in its own right. Maybe it paves a pathway for Republican legislators to grow a little bit of a spine. (Not hopeful)
AGPL, nice


Sure, but obviously an active shooter changes the situation in a way that authorizes deadly force.


By whose definition? Gang members ARE civilians, (assuming they’re not actively shooting at things). Just because they’re damaging to society does not change that definition.


Even if they WERE gang members, civilized nations do not shoot civilians.
They could have boarded the ship and detained them, but they chose violence.
Oh no the oven is too hot, guess we better turn up the heat more!