It depends on which Republicans, I suppose.

Many seem to argue about states rights in regards to the Civil War, wherein the southern states wanted rights to enter northern states and force them to obey the southern State’s laws…

To me, enforcing laws across state lines seems far more Federalist than State isolationist.

And I would argue many claiming “States Rights” today want their states rules to be enacted in other states as well, e.g. the push to federally ban abortions

Then this announcement means nothing either way. You can use alternative stores on those phones, still

I was pointing out that switching to Graphene/Lineage doesn’t protect you from the problem being stated in the article as OP implied

Since this is part of Play Integrity API, it’s more likely that this just completely blocks Lineage/Graphene from running these apps too.

It requires your device to be attested as unmodified by Google’s server

I’d assume he “graduated” because of his father’s donations being tied to his graduation, not due to academic prowess

but so far I’ve been right about everything

Ffs. Why are the dumbest people the most overconfident.

There seems to be some inverse relation between confidence and intelligence…

I put the curl command to update my duckdns IP in cron about 13 years ago, and have never needed to touch it once.

It’s just worked for me

I would argue it is an important distinction, though.

The original statement implies that there is a problem in how California classifies what constitutes a risk.

That comment claims that it’s manufacturers being lazy.

If it’s manufacturers being lazy, then the issue is the regulation is too relaxed, allowing them to just bypass the regulation by slapping pointless stickers on things (like websites try to do with cookie banners)

If the actual requirements to not need the sticker are so stringent that everything with the label actually does need it, then there’s a problem with the level of danger listed and the regulation is too onerous.

Alpine already doesn’t use systemd

Ukraine already had security promises from the US, UK, France, and China.

It didn’t help them in 2014, and now the US is trying to help Russia again.

I doubt Ukraine will accept any security promise short of being an official member of NATO

He’s on video congratulating people like Charles Schwab making 2.5 billion dollars from his constantly changing tariffs, so…

Probably that. Occam’s razor and all

Oh, damn. He’s going against Trump’s statements here, so Trump is certainly asking someone to google how he can fire the VP.

Could lead for some funny interactions soon

They already have one: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budapest_Memorandum

Offering another empty promise is unlikely to cause them to make concessions again

There’s no chance in hell Vance knows what that phrase means

If an attacker gets access to your system, they will be able to ensure you can’t get rid of their access

It will persist across operating system installs

However, this requires them to get access first