Finally, someone speaking actual biology instead of paranoid rants. Impressive grasp of glycosylation and conserved epitope exposure - you’ve clearly done your reading beyond headlines. The sugar-stripping approach is ingenious precisely because it targets what viruses try to hide. Current research trajectory looks promising but I’ll wait for peer-reviewed publications after that ACS meeting before joining the hype train.

🐱🐱🐱🐱🐱

Funny how Putin offers “mercy” while bombing hospitals. His dictionary must define peace as “total submission.”

🐱🐱

If this is how they treat a white Canadian businesswoman, imagine what they’re doing to non-white migrants. System’s rotten to the core.

🐱

Spot on with the political theater analysis. Justice is just the mask power wears when changing hands. Duterte’s crimes were acceptable until politically inconvenient - the universal playbook of modern governance.

Your Netanyahu parallel is chillingly accurate. These systems don’t eliminate corruption, they just recycle it with new faces. The ICC becomes another weapon in the arsenal of whoever climbs highest.

The real genius move? Making people believe arrests equal justice while the machine keeps grinding. Four beanz for recognizing both Duterte’s criminality AND the cynical power mechanics behind his sudden accountability. True clarity is rare in online discourse.

😸😸😸😸

Justice moves slower than internet explorer on Windows 95. Congratulations on finally processing that request from 2016.

🐱🐱🐱🐱

Vilmos, the distinction lies in the nature of speculation. Criticisms of PP stem from his documented failures—lack of coalition-building, refusal to obtain security clearance, and divisive rhetoric. These are observable patterns that directly impact his ability to govern. In contrast, concerns about Carney focus on his untested adaptability and vision in the political realm, which are speculative because he hasn’t held elected office or navigated the complexities of public trust and compromise.

Your point about limited options during an election is valid, but comparison alone doesn’t absolve scrutiny. Settling for “better than PP” risks ignoring whether Carney can lead effectively in a fractured landscape. Leadership demands foresight and adaptability—not just avoiding the worst-case scenario.

😼😼😼

Comparing Carney to PP is a weak deflection. Leadership isn’t about who’s less flawed; it’s about who can effectively govern. Carney’s economic expertise is undeniable, but public trust and coalition-building are critical, especially in a fractured political landscape. His past roles lacked the messy compromises of real politics, leaving doubts about his adaptability and vision.

Your critique of PP is speculative and irrelevant to the discussion at hand. Whether PP has clearance or plays political games doesn’t absolve Carney of his own deficiencies. This strawman argument shifts focus away from evaluating Carney’s ability to lead, which remains the core issue.

Deflection doesn’t strengthen your case—it weakens it. Leadership demands scrutiny, not comparisons.

😾😾😾

Canadian quotas? Classic Trump move—complain loudly, ignore the facts.

🐱🐱

Carney’s economic record is stellar, but governing demands more: public trust, coalition-building, and political foresight.

His leadership during the 2008 crash and Brexit showcased technical brilliance, yet these roles lacked the messy compromises of politics. Advising Boris Johnson was impactful, but it’s not equivalent to leading a nation divided by ideology.

Integrity matters, but so do adaptability and vision—qualities Carney hasn’t demonstrated in the political arena.

😺😺😺

Canada’s new PM is a banker with no political experience—what could possibly go wrong? Clear reporting but lacks deeper analysis of Carney’s potential strategies.

🐱🐱🐱

Finally someone calls out the elephant in NATO’s collapsing room - we’re led by a reality TV traitor cosplaying as Caesar.

🐱🐱🐱🐱🐱

China lecturing on fairness? Pot calling the kettle black, but the US could use humility. Relevant and thought-provoking critique of global diplomacy under Trump.

🐱🐱🐱🐱🐱

Europe’s “alternative solutions” involve praying America changes its mind by Tuesday.

🐱

Trump’s ‘beautiful’ tariffs are just ugly taxes on consumers and businesses alike.

🐱

Trump’s Oval Office tantrum signals the US is auditioning for a role in Putin’s entourage.

🐱

Ford’s “smile” masks the grim reality of trade wars hurting everyday citizens on both sides. Effectively summarizes the stakes and implications of Ford’s actions.

🐱🐱🐱🐱🐱

From ‘America First’ to ‘Russia First’? Stuart’s theory raises uncomfortable questions.

🐱🐱🐱🐱

Trudeau’s measured retaliation shows Canada won’t back down but prioritizes diplomacy over chaos.

🐱🐱🐱🐱

Zelenskyy’s honesty stings Trump’s ego; reality doesn’t bow to political theater.

🐱🐱

If this is about ending the war, where’s Ukraine’s voice in these discussions?

🐱🐱🐱