data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85f75/85f759489a08984d6dcae3cabcbfbfa35baf34ca" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cfd2a/cfd2a1dbdaa2a4665edc5da6ca698927da8c09c6" alt=""
A defence alliance
A defence alliance
4 years
that’s very optimistic
that sucks…
This is a great time to take stock of which of your news sources, friends or family can’t be trusted
Not the same ballpark
… they said while supporting more genocide
You fucked up, regardless of what you tell yourself now
deleted by creator
Repeated prisoners’ dilemma. They have to threaten and they have to add tariffs if the US does, anything else would be bad strategy
It’s not helped by the fact that Trump is corrupt and might have different winning conditions like “make Putin happy”, but that doesn’t change what Canada has to do.
There’s a lot of good books written by awful people. I guess Gaiman might be one of those awful people
Tailscale is very popular among people I know who have similar problems. Supposedly it’s pretty transparent and easy to use.
If you want to do it yourself, setting up dyndns and a wireguard node on your network (with the wireguard udp port forwarded to it) is probably the easiest path. The official wireguard vpn app is pretty good at least for android and mac, and for a linux client you can just set up the wireguard thing directly. There are pretty good tutorials for this iirc.
Some dns name pointing to your home IP might in theory be an indication to potential hackers that there’s something there, but just having an alive IP on the internet will already get you malicious scans. Wireguard doesn’t respond unless the incoming packet is properly signed so it doesn’t show up in a regular scan.
Geo-restriction might just give a false sense of security. Fail2ban is probably overkill for a single udp port. Better to invest in having automatic security upgrades on and making your internal network more zero trust
Isn’t that kind of necessary and what we did the last time? Add tariffs targeted towards products relevant to red states.
If the permanent members of the security council didn’t have veto powers they A: wouldn’t have joined, and B: would go “you and what army?” if people voted to force them to do something.
It’s just a way to keep a high level discussion going.
I don’t think that’s an accurate representation.
Covid happened. It hit most countries like that. Now he’s trying to balance things again, against intense opposition
The root cause is not recent. The french have been overspending for decades. Look at the debt to GDP ratio over time.
France has had two choices for a long time; continue overspending or balance the budget. They keep picking overspending.
Like Macron or not, but at least he’s trying to balance the budget. If he ends up failing, they’ll have to try again later, from a worse starting point, or over time descend into economic collapse
There’s no free lunch
They are enemy psy op actors, whether they know it or not
I imagine the thought process is that it’s easier to do it now during the chaos than later when there’s some form of new government and organised defence.
They’re taking out capabilities so a new, possibly not Israel friendly government, won’t have them, and thus will be less of a threat.
It doesn’t make it ok of course.
Or run the raid 5 or 6 separately, with hardware raid or mdadm
Even for simple mirroring there’s an argument to be made for running it separately from btrfs using mdadm. You do lose the benefit of btrfs being able to automatically pick the valid copy on localised corruption, but the admin tools are easier to use and more proven in a case of full disk failure, and if you run an encrypted block device you need to encrypt half as much stuff.
It’s not a proxy war. It’s an invasion with international support for the defence of the invaded nation.