Or Myanmar a few years ago… They promised elections…

So far, the country was transformed into a military dictatorship… I hope, this is only stage 1…

AfD is one of the main reasons why I am not sure whether Germany will be where I want to live in the future.

Why can’t they just let Gretta win?

I mean… They did, didn’t they? It was never the goal to actually get there. The goal was obviously media attention (again) and we are now commenting under a news article…

Its just a few truck loads of food.

That’s the point… Why let a few influencers enter a war zone with the risk of them getting killed when they could instead easily let a few trucks waiting in front of the boarder enter Gaza?

Awesome, no education for 50% of the population. What’s next? Replacing homes with caves and electricity with fire?

People often involved with piracy probably love entering personal information in that context…

FUCK

Der wollte doch die Faschos halbieren, oder?

Wrong country, I guess… Trump would have given a huge tip for that.

On the other hand, risking life in jail for a criminal organization instead of creating a new non-criminal one is very intelligent!!!111

And shifting the debate from Gaza itself to some UK crime club for sure helps the people in Gaza!!!111 Very intelligent!!!111

(instead of just creating a new organization that does not do crime at all and won’t be forbidden)

Terrorism is when a group attempts to strike fear and terror into a populace to coerce them

The Wikipedia article mentions different definitions.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism

Terrorism, in its broadest sense, is the use of violence against non-combatants to achieve political or ideological aims.[1] The term is used in this regard primarily to refer to intentional violence during peacetime or in the context of war against non-combatants.[2] There are various different definitions of terrorism, with no universal agreement about it.[3][4][5] Different definitions of terrorism emphasize its randomness, its aim to instill fear, and its broader impact beyond its immediate victims.[1]

I mean, it may not match how you use that word, because you might think about bin Laden when hearing that word “terrorism”, but let’s see how the word is actually defined:

Terrorism, in its broadest sense, is the use of violence against non-combatants to achieve political or ideological aims.[1] The term is used in this regard primarily to refer to intentional violence during peacetime or in the context of war against non-combatants.[2] There are various different definitions of terrorism, with no universal agreement about it.[3][4][5] Different definitions of terrorism emphasize its randomness, its aim to instill fear, and its broader impact beyond its immediate victims.[1]

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism

Probably not, but is that even necessary? No, it is not.

Terrorism, in its broadest sense, is the use of violence against non-combatants to achieve political or ideological aims.[1] The term is used in this regard primarily to refer to intentional violence during peacetime or in the context of war against non-combatants.[2] There are various different definitions of terrorism, with no universal agreement about it.[3][4][5] Different definitions of terrorism emphasize its randomness, its aim to instill fear, and its broader impact beyond its immediate victims.[1]

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism

Well, that was one of their actions. I mean, it might be daily business for you… But for me, getting access to fighter jets, sabotaging them and doing whatever else they did there does not sound like usual activity that some other organization would do. I have never head of someone from an LGBT organization seen sabotaging fighter jets… During BLM, there was also no organization sabotaging fighter jets or anything remotely similar to it.

for any group that opposes the government.

Organizing a protest on the streets is the base form of “opposing”. Sabotaging stuff by breaking the law is for sure also “opposing”, but I don’t think, we should put that on the same level.

Thanks for your arguments without any insults.

I get your point, although from my view, it’s not a random organization that is just like any other, as the intensity of the crimes is… exceptional. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestine_Action#Legal_actions

rancid bullshit

Great base for a dialog…

why do you imply that media attention in this case is bad

Did I?? I said “I get it” above… I just spoke out what others here don’t want to speak out… I guess, people will be surprised again, when Greta will successfully fail to enter Gaza the next time (according to plan).

you support an org that spray painted a few jets

Read the Wikipedia article… https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestine_Action

BTW: Jets don’t park at the side of the road… You usually need to break into military related areas to do so, which is not what average people do.

I guess they’ve successfully removed all meaning from the word “terrorist” now.

And we have successfully replaced the debate about people starving in Gaza with a debate about a British group that continuously breaks the law.

I kind of get what you are writing, but why are people focussing on the group that obviously broke the law (the law there sees it as terrorism) - and not just one time, but multiple times, the Wikipedia article is not short… - instead of the actual goal?

Why not forgetting the criminal (if you don’t want to call is terroristic) group, creating a new group that does not commit crime and protest for the actual thing???

Well, the one sentence supports people starving and the other one supports an organization classified as terroristic in the UK… It’s not the same thing…

When I write “Europe colonizing America in = bad” and I just append the word “fakenews” or “lies”, it changes the meaning…

anyone who thinks that illegally trying to stop a weapons shipment is terrorism

I mean… The law of the UK defines what falls under terrorism. It does not matter what anyone thinks.

If a pro-Russian saboteur sabotages a weapon shipment to Ukraine, it will fall under the term, too.

If “using force to achieve a political goal” is terrorism, then nearly every country on the planet is a terrorist organization.

The term is usually not used to describe nations. It’s to describe people or groups of people.