Can you explain to me how you’re supportive of Israel’s government and its actions without it being from a conservative or fascist perspective?
What do you identify as?
I never called you antisemitic, I don’t conflate opinions on Israel or Zionism with people’s Jewish identity. There are many anti-Israel and anti-Zionist Jews.
This is consistent with your fascist mindset at least, and it’s the exact attitude that led to interment camps. Congratulations.
Conservatives can’t see shades of grey and they’re too fragile to let them be so a black and white worldview is forcibly imposed on everyone.
You’re everything wrong with humanity.
Yes the acquiescence of all editorial and publishing decisions by these tech companies to “the algorithm” (which somehow absolves them of responsibility) is the main culprit there.
These platforms are more like radio infrastructure or TV infrastructure than any particular channel, and for the most part anything they specifically promote and fund doesn’t tend to be that alt right content which is completely algorithm driven and ad/sponsor/dark money supported.
We need to employ nuance when discussing these platforms.
What an easily manipulated little fool. Fascists are just reaping and reaping what they’ve sown. Reducing words to simple labels for “us” vs. “them” without looking at how those actions compare and contrast.
By definition I’m the good guy, by definition you’re the bad guy, anything else is too hard on my feeble brain.
It’s not your fault, you might forget to breathe if you try to apply that thing.
When you strike people arbitrarily with booby traps that tends to happen.
American soldiers go home too, is it ok to blow up their families?
“Embed with children.” It’s an interesting way to describe being with your civilian family while not actively engaged on the battlefield.
When soldiers get to board my plane early I’ll be sure to expect it to be shot down, since I’m just a human shield in that scenario.
did the children that were killed operate those pagers?
if I booby trap something intended for someone else but your son or daughter is in possession of it when it triggers, is that precise?
How about the fact that this appears to have been an intent to maim (despite also killing children).
Are these the types of tactics we want to normalize? Or is it just ok when it’s used on brown people.
Would Russia doing this to Ukraine count as a well executed precise attack? Vice versa?
There are tons of highly educational YouTube channels, and traditional media has completely abandoned that kind of content. The average YouTube video has more educational content than “The Learning Channel.” And you are more likely to get accurate information about history than “The History Channel”
This is a boomer take.
hey fucking idiot: in war you usually don’t kill people statistically randomly.
stop crying in every thread about this topic and get your own party in line
“foreign aid” is one tiny way that American stolen wealth makes its way out. Notably you didn’t say “military aid”
you Americans will blame anything and everything before capitalist wealth hoarding
If we want to uphold the principle of international diplomacy and the summit represents a huge bloc of the world’s population then yes he really should. If Israel is hosting an event for dozens of countries he should. He’s not just visiting his buddy Putin or Netenyahu. He’s the main diplomat of the UN.
The UN is a diplomatic organization that represents the entire world and exists to provide non-violent outlets for issues between nations. Being present at BRICS, which is rapidly adding membership and represents a counter-bloc to Western oriented alliances like NATO and the G7 (which expelled Russia in 2014.) is part of that mission.
Guterres was at the G7 summit https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/press-encounter/2023-05-21/secretary-generals-press-encounter-g7-summit
Why shouldn’t he be at a similar summit representing:
Combined, the BRICS members encompass about 30% of the world’s land surface and 45% of world population
The UN isn’t (rather: shouldn’t be) a Western organization. It’s a global organisation. His attendance there is a necessary part of his duties.
From the perspective of any nation on the receiving end of US aggression his participation at the G7 would have been seen as equally upsetting. You’re letting your bias in favor of Ukraine color your judgement.
deleted by creator
this also puts in perspective how dystopian all of the “this person might be the world’s first trillionaire!!!” articles are
deleted by creator
Capitalist threats of leaving are hilarious. Oh no the non-contributors will leave. The workers are the economy. If capital flight becomes a problem that’s only a problem within a larger capitalist framework.
Let them all leave, then we can own our own labour output.
Here’s a link showing how oligarchy forms under free market systems https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/is-inequality-inevitable/
Have you read it?
Too bad the campaign is over they could have paraded him around