How is it going with Marcos? Are they corrupt?

Smaller countries are easier to get new governments in. The bigger it is the harder it is to oust a leader, let alone get better leadership in after.

I think these south asians are on to something with their methods of protesting here, idk if I can say this on here but targeting the homes of lawmakers garnered by corrupt means, and government buildings, seems to be a good strategy.

Sri lanka, indonesia, and nepal all did this recently and I think I am missing some even.

Not a fuĺl throated motion.

Last time they got mexico’s calderon to do that it predictably splintered the cartels yielding unending violence.

Someone will fill the market. I say legalize coca leaf to lessen demand.

I wonder if he did like Cut outlines that they could paste up there and then spray over it? Because time certainly would have been an issue at that location. Is incredible detail it seems like it would take forever if not for the outline already being done elsewhere.

The UK is about just as fucked up as the United States is right now in a lot of ways, their leader is just don’t say stupid shit constantly. They have basically made it illegal to protest, not just on the Gaza on a lot of stuff, environmental, global warming, and the judges just took away the defenses protesters were using, not allowing them to say why they were doing it. And they are hitting him with these huge sentences is not like it’s months in jail we’re talking years or more.

Just to give you an idea of where they are at there was another recent case where a woman that took some abortion pills that she got from the doctor as per their laws was charged under some like 19th century law with some huge felony charge. She got not guilty but not for lack of trying on the prosecutor’s part.

It’s on the ministry of Justice building, which and this is true is worth a lot more than the painting, even if it was not a sharply critical piece against the ministry of Justice. They absolutely are going to paint over it.

Yeah they plan on painting over it. They covered it up and put two policemen to guard it to make sure nobody looks at it.

What are you talking about and what is your purported point here? You are denying toxic chemicals are toxic?

Conflating things like Tylenol with things like pfas, endocrine disruptors, BPA, pesticides?

Things that are toxic are generally intrinsically harmful. Like arsenic, endocrine disruptors, like pesticides. Little amounts are bad for you and create harm. Like getting a few parts per billion of pfas is bad for you.

Things that are not toxic will generally not harm you in low doses. Like water you can overdose on water, but it is not toxic.

Your point here seems to be lacking unless I am missing it?

There is plenty of evidence after you exit the backside of the manufacturers of these chemicals. Warm and safe though it may seem up there, there is no future travelling further in.

Probably just started another without attention on them. Labour is such a shit show, fascist nhilists they believe in nothing.

Any symbolic moves are to placate those with consciouses, giving them another 6 weeks to wrap up the starvation phase of their final solution for gaza or they will do something thay changes nothing, while making protesting de facto illegal and locking down the internet connecting all ip’s to faces and id’s in a database political leadership could access without warrant or nat sec assent.

There are a number of endocrine disruptors they use not just the one you mentioned,. Consumer Reports has looked at it. But it is also bad for tourist areas that have a lot of swimmers like coral reefs, all the sunscreen washes off and fucks up the animals.

That is preposterous equating all of the toxic shit in everything we use with anti-vaxxers. You must really not know what the fuck is going on.

Yeah I read the article, I was just adding the part about the endocrine disruptors cuz that’s what I care about. It said an American company actually had guy go to jail for faking results at some point.

The mineral sunscreens also do not rub in at least the ones I have gotten. So a lot of people won’t want to use them.

Idk about that companies that use toxic stuff always deny its toxic, then if forced to admit it’s toxic say it is in amounts too small to affect you.

I certainly would not take their word for it or people they pay to say so.

It has real effects on coral reefs and other areas where people swim and have it wash off in. And there are a range of endocrine disruptors in lots of goods that do have real effects on people even if not quite noticeable. Amphibians are particularly sensitive to them and can wipe out populations in the low parts per billions.

Consumer Reports is not a bad place to start.

There are toxin concerns in sunscreen too, some use endocrine disruptors like oxybenzone. Bad for you and where you swim.

Not mentioned is the active ingredients in your sunscreen, many being endocrine disruptors like oxybenzone.

The ones that physically block with like titanium and aluminum compounds are best for not flooding your body and waters you swim in with hormone disrupting chemicals, especially damaging in coral reefs.

As I referred to classically, it refers to 2,000 years ago or more. Which for a few centuries they had been subjugated by the Greeks and then Romans, the rulers of which adopted Eastern norms and declared themselves God and ruled as an all-powerful monarch.

Part of the difference now is that before it was the National Security type people that had the information, no the politicians themselves will be able to access it, as well as numerous outside groups able to hack the system. So it is a world of difference even if the internet is compromised on a basic level. Especially now with these computer programs able to sort and make assumptions however unfounded about people.