Just a basic programmer living in California

  • 0 Posts
  • 19 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: February 23rd, 2024

help-circle
  • Hospitals are required to provide emergency treatment - what we call ED or ER visits - regardless of ability to pay. Patients are expected to pay for that treatment. It’s just that the hospital isn’t supposed to deny treatment based on whether they think patients will or won’t pay the bill. This is getting-stabilized treatment.

    This is an important point in arguing for universal healthcare: if people can’t afford treatment, they’re more likely to go to the ED where they won’t be turned away. ED visits tend to cost more than non-emergency, so that drives costs up.







  • Don’t say “acronym” when you mean “abbreviation”!

    “Acronym” specifically refers to an initialism that forms a new word. For example,

    • scuba (self-contained underwater breathing apparatus)
    • NASA (pronounced like a word - you don’t say “ehn eh ess eh”).

    It’s acro- (height) -nym (word) - a word that exists on top of / above other words.

    In contrast “NIH” is not an acronym because it isn’t pronounced or read as a word. It’s appropriate to say, “‘NIH’ is an abbreviation” or “‘NIH’ is an initialism”. But saying “‘NIH’ is an acronym” is wrong!




  • 1 cm is about the width of the tip of your pinky finger.

    1 m is about the distance from your nose to your fingertips if you hold your arm out, and extend your fingers.

    100 m is the length of the straight section of an athletic track, which is about the same length as a football field.

    1 mL is about the volume of the tip of your pinky finger.

    1 L is about 1 quart, which is half a carton of milk (unless you get milk in the smaller 1 quart size).

    The mile-to-km conversion is pretty close to 1½.

    The kg-to-pound conversion is two-and-a-bit.

    A difference of 1°C is close to a difference of 2°F.

    Edit: My milk comparison was wrong - I’ve corrected it.

    Edit: Of course by “m” I meant “mile”





  • I’m not a lawyer either. But going off the company store insight, maybe we can look to the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. It prohibits paying wages in scrip, or “similar devices”. Scrip can take a couple of forms; one is an internal company currency that can only be spent at the company store. That provision in the FLSA was specifically intended to shut down company store scams.

    It seems that an implied condition of your work is spending some portion of your wages at certain stores. Since scrip is money that can only be spent in certain places, it might be argued that if you are required to spend a portion of your wages in certain places, that has the same effect as paying a portion of your wages in scrip.

    Unfortunately after a bit of searching I haven’t seen this specific argument made. But again, I’m not a lawyer, and I don’t know how to research case law. It sounds like they’re trying to claim this program in optional, so it might be challenging to prove that participation is de facto mandatory. I’m guessing if you could get someone to tell you a number for how much they expect you to spend in this program that would help with such an argument. On second thought, I don’t actually know how helpful a number would be, and I don’t want to get you in trouble.





  • My wife has worked with lots of people who are not native English speakers who are sometimes taken aback by the idioms. One colleague flat out refused to accept that “FOMO” is a word.

    I suggested that she is in a position to make some up, like “Let’s not put fish in the milk bucket.” But she didn’t go for it. I guess she’s not an agent of chaos after all :/