Let me guess, they shot it down.

… read the article. Yeah, they shot it down.

That is 100% what every country needs to be doing. These aren’t mistakes.

Depends on who he talked to last. Like every other time. It’s all just manipulation of the Presidency. Both foreign and domestic.

I’m inclined to say that her vote wasn’t cast in time, even though it wasn’t her fault.

I’d say the exact opposite. The vote was on April 28th, she mailed her ballot on April 5th and it was returned to her on May 2nd.

She mailed her ballot in 23 days ahead of time. That is more than enough time to ensure your vote will be counted. There’s zero reason to expect your ballot to not be received and counted using the pre-printed label or for it be returned to you more than 3 weeks later.

This isn’t a case of someone sending it a day or two before and standard processing taking it past a deadline.

Not sure why you are being downvoted for this

The downvotes are probably because they’re just stating something obvious. No shit, bad looking CGI looks bad, that doesn’t mean the actual CGI itself is necessarily bad. Small things like wrong lighting can make otherwise great CGI look terrible. The reasons DO matter, even if the average person may not really care and just has the takeaway of “bad CGI”.

Posting that type of response is not actually providing anything to the discussion, it’s a useless comment that provides no value. Not all comments and opinions are valid or constructive. The voting system is not really for agree/disagree, but whether a post adds to the discussion.

I’d argue it matters quite a bit. It shows producers, and by extension a studio, that can’t manage production effectively, and that almost always extends to the rest of the movie. “Bad” CG is rarely the only issue with those movies, it’s just what you remember most since movies in general require the suspension of disbelief and that pulls you right out of it.

And often that’s not because the CGI itself is bad quality, but because the effects team was asked to do the impossible with half the tools necessary. The “fix it in post” mentality.

Even small things like having reference lighting examples from the set can be the difference between an okay outcome and something almost imperceptible.

There’s a lot of other shorr from content. There’s a lot that’s just quick highlights of longer form stuff for instance.

My YouTube Shorts algorithm doesn’t have any of that type of shit in it. Because that’s not the type of stuff that I watch, that’s not the stuff it recommends to be either.

If you’re using a new or privacy focused web profile, it’s going to show a lot of random things because it has no idea what you would want.

One doesn’t prevent the other. Congress can do more than one fucking thing at a time, despite what they try to make us believe with this type of bullshit.

No, I’m demanding everyone involved be held responsible regardless of the political party, as I said in my comment. But apparently people here seem to not like that idea based on the downvotes.

I mean, yeah in this case that seems to be indicated by the evidence.

I get downvotes yet the responses are agreeing with what I said.

I can only assume that because I called out the Dems for bullshit politicas releasing only certain names and protecting their own, people are assuming I’m trying to make the opposite claim, yet the next 2 sentences prove otherwise.

So they’re not actually reading and comprehending the comment, they’re just reacting to their own assumption of what the rest of my comment must be in their head.

That certainly seems to indicate that people have terrible reading comprehension, vote, and comment without actually reading the comments fully.

So you tell me… if they’re agreeing with my comments, then why the downvotes if not a lack of reading comprehension and impulse control on social media?

Not surprising that people here have terrible reading comprehension and just vote and post knee jerk reactions based on their biases just like everywhere else. Social media was a mistake across the board. It’ll be the downfall of our society.

That’s exactly what I said, idiot.

I can only think that you had a knee-jerk reaction assuming my initial word choice meant something that it clearly didn’t. That reaction is a large part of the problem with online discourse getting nowhere and everyone arguing all the time. You’re arguing with people agreeing with you for no fucking reason because you’re not actually stopping to understand the comments before responding.

Cool, now start naming the Dems as well. This isn’t a political issue. Everyone related to this shit needs to be held accountable.

It is a war crime as defined by the International Court. You don’t have to be in a formal war to commit a war crime.

Doesn’t matter. It’s a war crime either way.

Abusers always try to hide in plain sight. The type of abuse doesn’t matter. And they try to surround themselves in a cloak of protection from what they are.

It’s the same thing fascists do, wrap themselves in the flag and “protect” from the “others”, projecting power through violence, as a threat.

There’s definitely something else, this is just a convenient reason to point to. Might not even be a legitimate relationship, just something made up to save face for whatever even worse thing is the truth.

So they’re going to invade? Aren’t they the ones complaining about invasions by “unwanted” people?

I know it’s all bullshit, but I still have to point out the hypocrisy whenever and wherever they do it.

Lucifer dared to question his father and was cast out for eternity and demonized for not blindly obeying. Not surprising he’d be a bit salty about that.

IIRC in the Bible Lucifer only kills one person, versus the millions God kills at a whim, usually for disobeying some bullshit he came up with that he never told anyone about.

Satan really just runs the place for God’s undesirables. Why would you want to worship the largest mass murderer in history in the first place though?

Assuming the stories and parables are true, or even based on any sort of reality, which of course they aren’t.

They’re buying 2 of them. Not exactly bailing anything out.