Daemon Silverstein

If I know correctly, some satellites have ionic propellers, needing just electricity to function.

Internet Archive (sued by publishers, then sued by music labels), now Wikipedia being sued… I’m just saying… Sounds like there’s a declared war against historical archives and freedom of information.

It’s actually not nice, not for local wildlife, for example. Biomes exist for a reason and if anything changes abruptly, evolution can’t keep up with these changes, resulting in extinction of several species. Just like flowers are blooming in Antarctica, a rainy and green Sahara is as beautiful as a rose with thorns under its petals: really beautiful, but ominously dangerous.

What if the patient opting for euthanasia is a tetraplegic (therefore, a person that lost their ability to press buttons) whose condition emerged from an underlying disease/condition that has no cure for the foreseeable future and that’s why they chose euthanasia instead of suffering? How such person is even supposed to “press the button”? In this hypothetical example, I’m considering that such person is capable of explicit consent through speech before several witnesses and some judge or their lawful representative, saying something like “I, John Doe, as an exertion of my human right imbued free will, I hereby authorize my euthanasia because such-and-such and whatsoever… being done by M.D. Luke Doe as an anesthesiologist professional authorized by me to do so”.

I mean, the very purpose of the right of euthanasia is to consider this right especially for people who’re painfully suffering from irreversible conditions, such as terminal diseases, conditions that bring such unbearable suffering for those who have them, although I’m more inclined to the thought that “Life should be a right to everyone, but shouldn’t be an obligation nor a duty to anyone” independent of any underlying conditions. In any case (be it euthanasia only for terminal diseases or euthanasia for anyone who wants it), of course explicit consent is a must, be it verbal or handwritten, and I think that the long bureaucracy is enough for the patient to authorize any assisted euthanasia.

Laws in the rich Alpine country permit assisted suicide so long as the person takes his or her life with no “external assistance”

So it’s not “assisted”. By “assisted”, I understand a kind of euthanasia where, for example, an anesthesiologist administer a cocktail composed by both an IV sedative then a lethal injection of something that’ll make heart to stop beating, obviously after a long bureaucracy needed to ensure patient’s will and consent.

I’m a “pagan” demonolater, therefore, I do not worship the christian god neither Christ as a “savior” (I’m actually a Lilith’s worshipper) but, it’s needed to be mentioned that the existence of Christ as a Nazarethian man is well-proven even by the religion-free science and history. While I agree that it doesn’t prove any of his “holiness” nor his affiliation to “God himself”, he truly existed as a man. One doesn’t need to worship Christ to know his historical existence as a human being.

For example, as from Wikipedia’s article regarding Publius Cornelius Tacitus, a Roman historian:

The Annals is one of the earliest secular historical records to mention Jesus of Nazareth, which Tacitus does in connection with Nero’s persecution of the Christians.

Also from the article regarding Yosef ben Mattityahu, a Jewish historian:

Josephus’s works are the chief source next to the Bible for the history and antiquity of ancient Israel, and provide a significant and independent extra-biblical account of such figures as Pontius Pilate, Herod the Great, John the Baptist, James, brother of Jesus, and Jesus of Nazareth

It’s worth mentioning that the latter is Jewish and Jewish beliefs do not worship Jesus (because the arrival of a “Mashiach” is a promise yet to be fulfilled by “HaShem”, according to Orthodox Jewish tradition), so I bet his work is even more valuable in proving Christ as a man than the bible’s new testament itself.

According to my searches, while a RTG uses radioactive material weighting in the scale of kilograms (average of 5 Kg across missions such as Voyager and Cassini), a nuclear power plant requires several tonnes worth of plutonium and enriched uranium. The minimal critical mass for plutonium is 10kg, the double of how many fuel RTGs hold (that’s why RTGs don’t blow while ascending and/or on space). It’s a large difference of mass/weight between RTG fuel and rods for nuclear power plants. They’d need to carry the whole tonnes worth of radioactive material split across very small quantities (which would require a lot of lead walling and/or launches)

I can imagine a rocket full of plutonium and uranium rods, sitting above immense tanks of combustible liquid: what the odds of such a rocket exploding during ascent? What are the effects of solar and cosmic radiation energy over these rods (even if they’re lead shielded), especially around Van Allen radiation belt? So many questions.