i am more than willing to engage on any positive claim you want to make (i probably agree with a lot of them). what i’m not willing to do is tolerate personal attacks and dogpiling.

  • 0 Posts
  • 15 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: August 5th, 2023

help-circle






  • the more I dig into this paper the worse it gets. it’s calculating inputs from feed and land use change. this is as bad as poore-nemecek. but it’s not even using data from the operations, instead it’s just guessing.

    no one should take this paper seriously, except academic rhetoricians who need to show their colleagues how the trappings of science are used to spread claims without evidence.

    edit:

    page 65: this report is an extrapolation based on ivanovich et al, which itself is an extrapolation based on poore-nemecek. this is bad science built on bad science.

    I’m totally open to the claims that are presented, but the evidence used to support it simply can’t do that.



  • the vast majority of beef cattle gain most of their weight grazing. cattle in particular consume very little of the soy crop, but what portion of the soy crop that is fed to any livestock is by-and-large the industrial waste from producing soybean oil. recovering that to feed to livestock is a conservation of resources.