

Information superhighway
Seer of the tapes! Knower of the episodes!


Information superhighway


Start saving for old age now. It might seem like a long way off, and you might not have much money right now to begin with, but being young and poor is way better than being old and poor.


It may be possible…
It may not be necessary…


A Nintendo64 with several game cartridges. It’s a little flaky, but it still works for the most part.


Californian. No.
It wouldn’t solve any problems that can’t be solved by other means, and it would create new problems that we haven’t had to worry about before. It’d be a net loss for everyone involved.


UI elements that expand and cover up other UI elements when you mouse over them.
“Flat” color schemes where you can’t even tell where one UI element ends and the other begins.
Infinite scroll instead of pagination.


He’ll have to show us his Earth certificate, though.


Some species of ants invade neighboring colonies and carry away larva to work as slaves.


Reminds me of the internet legend known as The Forgotten Employee


Wouldn’t it be states 51-60?


If a motorcycle has to be ear-splittingly loud for “safety”, then it’s too dangerous to be road legal.


Ask Robespierre how that works out in the end.


I’m not familiar with the idiom “spitting on the wrong horn.” Here’s the context of the quote:
But weigh this [the evils of liberty] against the oppression of monarchy, and it becomes nothing. Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem [“I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery”]. Even this evil is productive of good. It prevents the degeneracy of government, and nourishes a general attention to the public affairs. I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing, and as necessary in the political world as storms in the physical.


I feel like you’re arguing a point I haven’t taken a position on. I’m only saying that arrests like this seem insane to an American sensibility.
The conservatives gave it the power to prosecute people for protesting climate change and made it inadmissible evidence for them to explain the reasons for their protest
But I will say that changing the law like that is also insane to an American sensibility.


It’s less about thinking she shouldn’t be punished for her speech, and more about thinking that the state shouldn’t have the power to punish speech. To quote Thomas Jefferson, “I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery.”


It’s not a question of what speech I think should be allowed, but rather a question of what powers I think the state should have.
Reminds me of the old trick on HTML forms where you use CSS to make one of the form fields invisible to humans and reject any submission that filled in that field.