We already established that this is straight up false. Ask your handler for better material.

She specified her criticism was against pro-Hamas, and you’re saying because she didn’t make an additional redundant statement to clarify what that means that she’s implying something other than her literal words? And her call for ceasefire isn’t specific enough, despite the fact that she doesn’t have the authority to draft specific details anyway?

Your reading comprehension isn’t justification for extrapolating these wild hypotheticals.

This is a convoluted uncharitable interpretation. She specifically condemns support of pro-Hamas graffiti and rhetoric. It’s disingenuous to read that as blanket condemnation of all pro-Palestinian protesters.

deleted by creator

This is just plain false.

That said, she didn’t have to condemn everyone.

Then it’s a good thing she didn’t, and specifically singled out pro-Hamas sentiment.