• 0 Posts
  • 12 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 2nd, 2023

help-circle


  • If people hated the bill on it’s own, then shouldn’t it be less popular than Trudeau?

    No.

    Therefore anything connected with him is going to have an inherent downward swing of opinion due to the association? Right?

    No.

    These relationships can exist, but it’s not the case that they must exist. We know through polling what the favorability is of the CT: low. We know through polling how well understood it is: poor. We know through polling that people who don’t understand it are much more inclined to view it unfavorably. We already have a very straightforward explanation.

    Adding in Trudeau is adding a 3rd variable into the mix to explain something that’s already been explained. And when you add him it, you have to start inventing justifications to make things align with his numbers.

    It is the antithesis of Occam’s razor




  • Maybe. But if it was that simple then I’d expect it to be at least as unfavorable as Trudeau.

    I think it’s just people don’t understand it, and I think that’s frankly the fault of the liberals.

    People hear “tax” and go “shit that’s a thing I have to pay, right?” And “carbon” and say “my home is heated by natural gas and I drive to work” and then say “the government wants to tax me not to freeze and to get to work?” And then they don’t connect the dots that the money that keeps getting direct deposited to them by the government is funded by the tax.

    Like, if it was called “The Climate Bonus Payment” and the government had a little fucking fanfare around the distribution, it’d be wildly popular.