First things first: this should come as no surprise to anyone familiar with Japanese politics. It’s been a far right genocide denying shit show for roughly ever.
Secondly, “finalizing plans not to recognize Palestine for the time being” sounds like the epitome of bureaucratic time wasting 😄
“Can’t talk, too busy! I’m hard at work planning for not doing a thing right now!”
Russia might be, but that bar is lower than the Mariana Trench tbh…
I mean, the mere fact that you have to reach for two of the most poverty stricken and lacking in natural resources countries in the world to compare with literally the richest country in this world in both money and natural resources is in itself pretty damn indicative of the failure of the US system to guard from giving the incompetent and the thoroughly corrupt all of the power.
The US public has been protesting pretty much non stop since the 60s.
Their politicians have responded not by addressing the grievances of the people, but by increasingly criminalizing nonviolent protest to the point that it’s often classified as literal terrorism.
To call the US system a representative democracy is naive to the point of being downright farcical and has been for several decades.
Is it just me or is drawing out a supreme court ruling like the results episode of a tv talent show a really weird way to deal with an attempted coup?
Headline: insinuates that it’s a legitimate attack only on Hamas leaders*
Article body: 6 dead, none of them Hamas leaders according to Hamas.
*which is itself bullshit. Hamas isn’t just a terrorist organization, it’s also the government of Gaza.
Say what you will about the politics of said government, but even if only those leaders were targeted and killed, assassinating politicians and diplomats in a neutral third country is some REALLY fucking blatant war criming!
To distract from how their awful food made you cover your yard in vomit 🤝
gastroturfing
You mean like when you cover your yard in vomit?
Close:
The artwork was quickly covered up by large sheets of plastic and two metal barriers, under the guard of two security officers
Seeing my country’s (already shamefully atrocious) foreign minister and former prime minister next to that ambassador of evil is fucking nauseating! 🤬
Yeah, the US has ALWAYS been super authoritarian in its international dealings and has gone full fascist at home and abroad.
It’s not the pot calling the kettle black. It’s the leaking barrel of nuclear waste in the municipal water supply calling candy unhealthy.
Doesn’t read beyond the headline
Hell yeah! Feed those fish, Pope Bob! Feed them good!
I don’t know where to even BEGIN adequately refuting that whole wall of nonsense, so I won’t waste any more time on you to do so. Have the day you deserve.
I don’t think you being reactionary to a far-right whose not present here, or the letter writers trying to preach to the far-right from a “corrective left” perspective of professionals in the top end of town works.
Good thing that none of that is happening, then.
It’s hot air
Back to the self-description, I see.
The far-right aren’t going to read the edicts past down from on high and see the error of their ways
Public figures tend to react to media pressure and other public figures taking a public stand tends to create such pressure. This is politics 101 stuff.
It’s a totally pipe dream leftism that assumes “being a scold” does anything but push people right.
So what do you suggest, then? Never speaking up about harmful lies and the suffering they cause? Because that’s DEFINITELY not going to convince anyone.
I mean take yourself - you couldn’t even handle my original comment pointing that out.
Again with the ridiculous strawmen. You were wrong and I pointed it out. The only one unable to “handle” anything seems to be yourself.
Look at all the time we’ve wasted here just because you had an “I’ve detected prejudice” error.
Again, not the case. It doesn’t say anything good about your point that you need to keep insisting on two or three strawmen to make it.
This is just all the stuff the left gets wrong, that feeds into the far-right populism. We need an alternative ti being scolds
Yeah, right. Telling them that they’re harming people forces them to double down because that’s how interpersonal communication works 🙄
You’re invoking this comic in spite of pretending to be a leftist yourself:
they have the statistics and data to back them up.
Then again, 69% of statistics are made up on the spot or deliberately skewed and that goes double any time governments want to justify abusing foreigners.
Your studies demonstrate the fact that immigrants are much more likely to be the VICTIMS of sexual violence than native born people
No one said otherwise! Sorry, what’s your argument? That it doesn’t count as rape if immigrant men rape immigrant women? That’s disgusting dude.
No, that’s asinine. My point is that the anti-immigant rhetoric has nothing to do with protecting immigrants from being raped and everything to do with falsely portraying immigrant men as inherently likely to commit rape.
No asshole, of course that still counts as rape
I didn’t say or even imply anything to the contrary. You can pack away your weird strawman now.
Of course that’s part of the higher amounts of SA and SV in those communities.
Immigrant women being victims ≠ immigrant men being the perpetrators. To imply that immigration leads to rape is like implying that black people existing leads to killer cops.
I don’t know why you needed to be shown studies to admit that
I didn’t. In fact, I never suggested otherwise, see above.
Of course leftist elites aren’t going to recognize that, and are going to try to pretend it’s not true - like you were doing.
Again, that’s not what’s happening here.
The “leftist elites" are objecting to demagogues exploiting the very real problem of sexual violence against women (of which none of them nor I have denied that immigrant women are disproportionately the victims) as a way to further demonize and persecute immigrants.
I take it you’re no longer claiming it’s “just prejudice” to point this stuff out
Prejudice, conflating victims and perpetrators, or both. Take your pick.
That you see a problem with not addressing increased rape stats now
Nobody’s arguing for doing that.
not addressing and contextualizing gives the far right something to gripe about?
That’s the POINT: the far right are putting it in a false context for their own disinformation campaigns and you’re doing something similar for different reasons.
Meanwhile, the “leftist elites” are simply saying that demonizing and scapegoating immigrants doesn’t help any victims and is MUCH more likely to cause MORE immigrants to be assaulted by native born people who are taught to dehumanize them.
I’m so sick of leftwingers denying problems.
Saying that the fascists are blaming the wrong people is not denying that there are problems.
It’s a politics of willful blindness and denialism
Nobody’s denying anything. At least none of the people you’re accusing of it are.
Immigrants are vastly more likely to be VICTIMS of sexual violence than perpetrators.
Conservative men have very problematic attitudes toward immigrant women and women in general, to put it mildly.
This is rather tone deaf.
Now you’re playing rehortorical games rather than responding with an argument.
That’s rich coming from someone who’s literally spewing xenophobic and politically tribal stereotypes about “good neighborhoods” and “left wing elites” in response to a simple objection to racist demagoguery.
Your studies demonstrate the fact that immigrants are much more likely to be the VICTIMS of sexual violence than native born people, which does NOT justify the “immigrants are coming to rape our women” hate speech that the women in the article are objecting to.
Tbf, the whole thing WOULD be much funnier (and less embarrassing) with Colin Mochrie and Ryan Stiles playing the parts of the two doddering billionaire idiots and Aisha Tyler moderating 🤷