• 2 Posts
  • 355 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: December 4th, 2024

help-circle



  • Mostly the main reason

    Apart from not being true, that doesn’t even make grammatical or mathematical sense 😄

    That and state subsidies to kill the foreign car market with long term goals

    Except that goes both ways, with Europe and the US subsidizing their automakers and disadvantaging the Chinese ones just as much if not even more.

    Someone always suffers with capitalism.

    True.

    Even state capitalism

    Also true, although protectionism ≠ state capitalism.

    Capitalism is a philosophy/ideology where the maximum accumulation of capital possible is held up as the main goal of existence.

    Protectionism DOESN’T maximize the capital of the state, or the majority of the people residing in it, only the companies benefitting from it and the politicians they bribe.


  • European carmakers have dozens of EV models

    Yes, but they make many times more ICE ones than that, despite the fact that consumers generally prefer EVs as long as the price is right.

    and they are dominating the EU market though selling poorly outside it.

    That’s probably heavily influenced by national and EU subsidies and other regulations designed to give them significant advantages over non-European competitors, rather than what European drivers want.

    the ICE market in the EU still accounts for about three quarters of the market

    Because of the aforementioned stubbornness and preferential treatment more than anything else.

    The EU was going to ban new ICE cars by 2030, before lobbying from the major car making countries succeeded in pushing it back to 2040. I just hope they won’t succeed in their current efforts to push it back even farther if not repeal the regulation entirely 😮‍💨








  • No, you’re still bying their “self defense” narrative.

    They’re invading Lebanon for the same reason invasions ever happen: in order to own or at least control land that belongs to another country.

    There’s exactly one way that they could be safe from attacks from Lebanon: by stopping the occupation of and slaughter in Palestine.

    More than half the population of Lebanon are Palestinians driven from their homes by Israel two generations back at most, and that’s what created Hezbollah.

    Not Iran. Not antisemitism. Not spontaneous evil.

    Hezbollah was caused by the same thing as most radical paramilitary groups: desperation and fury in the face of seemingly untouchable tormentors.

    I’m not saying that they’d immediately disband the moment the occupation and genocide end, but it sure as hell would make the radicalization needed for recruitment harder to accomplish, especially as time goes on with no fresh atrocities.


  • A failure of Israel’s defensive weapons would require them to go on the offensive.

    According to themselves, a day ending in y would require them to go on the offensive.

    This is all a conflict of choice for them and the US and, if damage to the dome has any effect on them (which it probably won’t, since they’re so far gone down the colonialism genocide spiral), it would be to make them more cautious due to their own people being more vulnerable to consequences of their state terrorism.