About https://codeberg.org/ArtisanByteCrafter/pytube-gui/issues/7 Would it be ok if i try the playlist integration or do you want to do your things first?

Works pretty good but basic error handling is missing. I made a issue and a PR for it already. My first try at streamlit.

Its not a beacon of truth and facts lol. Mbfc isnt right everywhere.

Comment on the bots response with what you found, to notify them.

Having nothing and being a “trust me bro, this source is lit and unbiased” is better?

• source: Trust me bro

Having nothing and being a “trust me bro, this source is lit and unbiased” is better?

• source: Trust me bro

We are collecting all the feedback here: https://lemmy.world/post/18775630

We are trying to come to a better solution ( except removing fully the bot ).

You can even be better than that! You can make a community that fact check news article / news pages. Then we can add the threads from that community to the bot and have there news page specific discussion.

Thanks for the feedback. With the new format we will think about it, but i think this is pretty good.

We will discuss this and come back to you. We would love to open sourc ethe bot but the code quality for reading is not in a good state. We will have to clean the code up. But we will be working for that.

They have a point but strict fake news it isnt. It is not an option to leave it without any second bias opinion. Its not banning anyone. If you dislike it and demand it to be shutdown for democracy. Then you arent allowing other opinions.

Overwhelmingly negative? Those are the 24/7 negative users. We do anything: Those guys: THIS IS IS A THREAT TO DEMOCRACY

So you stand alone in that statement. See the post vote score.

We give you the option to block it. Block it.

No we dont. We saw the expected “ReMoVe ThE BoT” comments, because MBFC did hurt their feelings by not rating their favourite newspage the highest creditability on earth.

And just block it, then you can imagine how it is without the bot.

See reply in support post

Thanks! Your points are perfectly on target.

If we had any other api with parity of media bias / fact check, then we would have included it, but we only see paid, no api available.

But for now we have added a ground.news search link so that everyone can see a third opinion on it.

You got it. Thats the point. Its just advisory, not if its Bad creditability you will get banned.

Currently the code is for now private. We will see if we can make it public in the future. The mods wont moderate posts because of the MBFC result.

Ok then tell me an alternative we can use in the scale for free.

None? Then pls dont just complain complain complain… And dont suggest improvements.

Its better to have some “fact checking” than the “trust me bro” system.

We all know all “fact checking” systems have humans behind it, those humans can have biases, dislikes or do mistakes. But thats the reason why we should not have such system is not good. Its the viewers discretion to believe into the fact/bias checks of the given page. We are just giving our best effort to simplify the view.

Then i give you the recommendation to block the bot, if you dont like it.

deleted by creator

Have you ever investigated every news page for its bias? With no pay? I guess not. In the end there is a human doing that manually.

Because of that we added the ground.news search url, so that if you didnt believed it you can get other news pages thoughts on this article.

Yes, that everyone make a better picture. Instead of getting shouted at by one manipulative entity.