You seem to agree and disagree with me in the same comment.

Every human being is capable of change. Hitler was even capable of change; he killed himself when he realized he lost.

Yep. Most successful strategy with an opponent who can’t or won’t discuss terms is simply to retaliate as often as they betray you.

I don’t know how to help you. You changed the conditions of the hypothetical and are now puffing your chest out, defending your conclusions from it.

Just drop another line about your CV and peace out.

You made a pretty significant reading error and you’re trying to say other people don’t read well.

That’s hilarious.

The scenario at hand isn’t US Civil War 2. Pay better attention to reading next time so you don’t waste everyone’s time.

You keep saying that. Masturbate to your own fiction somewhere else.

Can you blog about this somewhere that doesn’t involve me? Calling the US economy backwards is laughable and now I don’t respect you.

Bye.

Again, I wish I lived in the world you think exists.

That’s a nice fantasy, fascists being incapable of reading and therefore incapable of invading other countries and killing people.

I would suggest you do not read a history book if you value the peace of mind that comes with that belief.

I don’t think putting a unified fascist populace behind the strongest military in the world is a great idea.

Sorry to butt in, but have any of you guys seen my derf around here?

I will say it’s often mentioned in news articles that the Senate or House is GOP/Democrat-held/run, but Wikipedia is obviously a different thing.

Until I did homework on the situation in Gaza, I didn’t know Hamas* was de facto in charge, and arguably de jure.

The Wikipedia “redundancy” is designed for people like I was: completely ignorant on the topic.

That’s why people go to Wikipedia, to educate themselves quickly.

If it was the Hamas National Hospital I’d agree with you.