So you are only capable of ad hominem discussions? That really speaks to your intellectual skills.

You know you can just be opposed to authoritarianism. Most decent folk are.

What article? It’s not the article being discussed and your google link sucks for the reasons already explained.

You need to provide a source if you are quoting one.

No, there isn’t. Anyone claiming to support the liberation of the working classes while praising authoritarian systems that are cracking down on those populations looking for freedom are hypocrites.

It’s weird you would make this about geographic location. Are you doing that because you don’t have a valid critique?

Nope, that’s been used for decades you are just seeing the limitations of google’s tools as it happened in places they do not index

This wasn’t an editorial. It was a snarky comment that you inappropriately are trying to make into an argument because you completely misread the situation

I think you need to be actually arguing with someone to make an argument against them, yes. You cannot make an argument when you aren’t doing so. You need to be debating to make logical fallacies. No one was doing that hence no one made a strawman argument.

Do you need this further explained? No argument was made. The side you are claiming I am making a strawman argument against is not present. There is no debate.

You used it wrong. Learn from this and move on. Don’t misuse them in the future.

You cannot present a strawman argument when the side you are arguing against isn’t present. Thus I was not making a straw man. That’s just insulting tankies

Don’t bring these up unless you understand them and in this case you do not.

You are using straw man incorrectly. Don’t even try to go down the path of rhetorical flaws if you fuck that one up.

It’s really only a matter of degrees as you can sell other things for a profit so why not your literature?

Which is true for China as well

artillery fire as a method of crowd control?

This isn’t a purity test. This is me making fun of the tankies on .ml

How many straight men do you know who have a sound grasp on women’s sexuality?

This isn’t about some online community as much as it is a comment on tankies.

But .ml communities promise meChina has mote free speech than the West! How is this possible?

/s

America could have easily won in both nations had the American public been willing to accept the slaughter of millions of innocent non-combatants (rather than the tens to hundreds of thousands of non-combatant deaths they are ok with).

Arab unity involving Iran? You know Iranians are mostly Persians, right?

Iranians tend not to be Arabs given their history as the nation of Persian peoples.

Because as we all know Persian and Arab Muslims stick together through thick and thin, right? /s