mommykink

Held in the relatively stable northeastern state of Pennsylvania on the eve of the 23rd anniversary of the country’s worst terrorist attack, the debate was a chance to showcase the democratic progress the country had made since the violent, shambolic elections and attempted coup nearly four years ago.

However, it got off to a less than stellar start. The three moderate candidates in the race – Jill Stein, Cornel West and Chase Oliver – were barred from participating. Instead, the contest pitted the two frontrunners: former President Donald Trump, the candidate of the far-white Republican Party, widely thought to be the political wing of white-Christianist militias, and Kamala Harris, the current vice president, who led a palace coup two months ago that forced the ageing, unpopular incumbent, President Joe Biden, to abandon his quest for re-election.

Lmao, too funny man. You should be like a writer on SNL or something

Got u

Lmao

And we can assume that these nukes, unlike the conventional armory, have been maintained since the Cold War and not sold off to private interests?

Said it a while ago, the US is losing at capitalism for the first time in modern history and doesn’t know how to cope

That’s very important information

Tiananmen Square Massacre really happened

Any tankies wanna take a spin on how this is actually a good thing?

Putin can’t even hold his own territory. I don’t think even he would open another front by attacking a NATO member even if the west started greenlighting their weapons be used in the incursion.

Union says they only have to solve one (1) case every quarter and if you disagree they’ll strike

No idea why you’re downvoted. Pringles and Waganr were 100% Nazi-adjacent

And now they are the second most powerful in Russia.

I think it’s been that way for longer than people think. Remember when Wagner just rolled through Russia without any resistance? Putin’s might has always been false promises/ blackmail, but it’s obvious now that Russia hasn’t had the means to back itself up for a while now

Doctors strike in India after rape and murder of trainee medic at hospital

Or as they call it in India… “Tuesday.”

I’m on your side. Without a direct call to action that breaks some laws, the idea that you can be arrested for “false communication” is straight up dystopian to me.

Yeah, way too many western countries have knee-jerked the opposite direction so hard that they’re willing to support another Holocaust, albeit against a different minority.

Reddit(dot)com(forwardslash)r(forwardslash)wooosh

I believe that’s probably the real reason, yes. I doubt that this many people are still upset about being asked to stay home for a few months and get a shot. What they’re mad about is what happened immediately after COVID, when they did everything they could, only to have had their livelihoods taken from them by opportunistic corporations and the elites while it was made literally illegal to speak out against it.

For the most part, people would’ve followed lockdowns without much protest if they had been taken care of and things were “still where they left them” when it lifted, so to speak. Most people struggle with critical thinking and are confusing correlation with causation.

I think most people are wising up to the fact that there were really concurrent pandemics.

The first pandemic was the 2019 SARS-CoV-2 (Coronavirus) outbreak. The existence of which was self-evident, measurable, and unavoidable (up to a point).

The second pandemic was the mass looting of public/private resources that corporations used the cover of the first pandemic to excuse themselves for. This pandemic was allowed to happen by ineffective (at best) or colluding (at worst (see: USA, Trump admin.)) governments around the world.

Most people see these are one event when in reality they were two. It’s also in the perpetrators of the second pandemic’s best interest to keep people believing that they were the same event.

Ah yeah I guess if I had the reading comprehension of an adult man and not a fucking chickadee I’d have seen that in the next sentence.

"[My kids abandoned me because] they said ‘Taking care of him is not our cup of tea.” That’s sounds extremely unlikely

My thoughts too. The person you’re quoting is apparently just 65, too, and a retired police officer. Obviously I’m just talking out of my ass here, but that sounds way too young to at the point of requiring full-time caregiving. I’m thinking there’s something more at play beyond what he’s letting on, but I could obviously be wrong