… And what if that protection comes through criminalisation? It’s legal in Germany, and has arguably made things worse

Strange typo, you wrote “generate” instead of “cost”

Who needs enemies, when you share a border with the Germans

“*.ml”

Unless Mélenchon changed his tuned again, last I heard, he was only against loans. Helping, yes, but no strings attached.

You think UK/France will nuke DC over Greenland?

You think the US would let those planes take off?

Go back to watching cnews, fascist scum

IDK if decades of financing the CCP can be called “containing”. But thank god the capitalists sabotaged the USA empire, we cruelly need something to counter this superpower

TIL I could just move to Algeria tomorrow

Ah yes, a racist shithole with a crappy culture, a crappy language, and a fucking average age close to what used to be retirement.

Grundsicherung is a mere 550e, no one lives nicely on that.

All the ones in Europe (if you count them as democratic obviously)

That’s like saying BRICS is an aggressive organisation because of what Russia is currently doing… Not the same, but in a similar vein. Not all of NATO was involved in Iraq (many countries were opposed to it, and it may as well have been a US only operation). Afghanistan… There technically was a casus belli, but I’ll agree the way the entire thing was handled was a disaster. The occupation following the initial invasion was, notably, a US thing, not a NATO one.

tbh this entire comment thread is trying to frame any discussion as being pro Russian. At least the pointless grammar bike shedding lets us know whom to block

Why a loan though? Just give them the assets. Trying to put a leash on Ukraine shouldn’t take priority over defending them

I normally like reading .ml comments because, despite disagreeing with most, I get to see a new perspective.

Well, yours here are not that. You just sound dumb.

Maybe if Germans stopped constantly betting on anyone that can undermine its neighbours to appease its own oligarchs, Europe wouldn’t be in this mess. Germans would rather sacrifice every single east European than admit France was right. To their credit, this is probably less of a dilemma and more of an opportunity to them, so that was an obvious choice.

Your compassion is misplaced, the corruption of that racist genocidal country affect its neighbours first.

Laws are certainly different for american scum than they are for the locals. Consider yourself lucky for not having experienced it, instead of dismissing what anyone who’s spent time around those terrorists would tell you.

I’m not even going to bother replying to the rest of your bootlicking, but just ask Greece how willingly they joined NATO.

Not possible, Americans only shoot Nazis they cannot hire. But that one is already on the same payroll so it’s all fine

We should do some A/B testing to confirm your first statement