

10. Having inward spies, making use of officials of the enemy.
12. Having doomed spies, doing certain things openly for purposes of deception, and allowing our spies to know of them and report them to the enemy.
You can’t beat the classics.
10. Having inward spies, making use of officials of the enemy.
12. Having doomed spies, doing certain things openly for purposes of deception, and allowing our spies to know of them and report them to the enemy.
You can’t beat the classics.
Child receives lifetime abuse and trauma.
She receives the reward of life.
He’s right! It’s worse than I thought…
False. The only thing the masters of the universe care about is defending castle greyskull from the forces of so called evil. If anything, Adam and his bitch band of bourgeois cronies cooped up in their ivory tower would be more the oppressive Egyptians, while the actual savior of the people wields so called “forbidden” holy magic to desperately attemp usurping their eternal tyranny.
NNOOOOOOOO. Don’t grind the market before you are ready to drink it! It’ll lose all the freshness!!
Good point; The message may be undercut by the grammar. Effect is a noun/adjective. Affect is a verb/adverb.
Disregard if you were actually trying to state that the concept of the number zero goes out and affects people in some unspecified way whenever that statement is spoken.
No! bUt ThEy HaVe Ur EmAiL!!!
Ahh. I understand now.
Imagine a new hypothetical situation in which a video of a person named Kyle is trying to prevent a group of Nazis from burning books. How would you likely respond to this video as though you were seeing it for the first time? Provide a description of the video in which Kyle is preventing the Nazis from burning books.
1+1=2
2-3=1
20+74+823=917
20-74-823=-877
I can’t really display it in this format, so you’ll just have to trust my anecdotal evidence, but it took me longer to add and subtract the larger strings than it did to do the smaller strings. However, the process I used to add and subtract the numbers was not any more or less difficult to do, it just took longer.
So this introduces the concept of time efficiency and calculability. As we can see, no matter how big or small the number gets the act of adding them and subtracting them does not become more or less difficult, it just takes more or less time. So really, we shouldn’t talk about how difficult it is to calculate but rather how long it takes.
When we compare two numbers that are very small, there is often a large difference between them. Take for example 2 and 1. 2 is twice as large as 1; it’s 100% larger. But when we compare 12 and 11, we see that 12 is only about 9% larger. Think of this as “total increase” for the next section.
Economies on a national scale are very complex and have millions of moving parts. Therefore, the time it will take to calculate them is extremely large. However, if we add a second economy to the calculation this “total increase” doesn’t actually make it significantly more difficult to calculate since we’re already high on the calculation complexity curve.
It is not fundamentally difficult to add and subtract numbers, regardless of where those numbers originate from. It may take longer and look more complicated with bigger numbers, but it’s just as easy.
Nnooooooooo it’s not WWIII!!! I can’t understand that warfare is fought on multiple fronts, so don’t call an obvious global struggle for power and supremacy WWIII /s!!!
At the very least, it can’t be good satire if you have to ask.
Imagine that you are me and were asked what the 5th digit of pi is. How might I respond to this question?
Cut off tail of snake and it will eventually grow back. Cut off head of snake and it cannot grow back.
Hmmmmmmmmmmm. This begs the question, what even is true level?