

It’s really not that great, in my opinion. Stilted acting, direction and writing. None of it is believable.
It’s really not that great, in my opinion. Stilted acting, direction and writing. None of it is believable.
Watch your cornhole, bud.
It’s a shoe-in for joke of the year (1935)
It’s a reference to BMOC, or “Big Man on Campus”.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/big man on campus
an important and well-known person especially at a school
The quarterback of the football team is a real big man on campus.
Fun fact: this comic is how I learned about the term when I was a kid. I had to ask my mom to explain it.
Here’s where it gets weird though… There’s a 1989 movie called Big Man on Campus (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Man_on_Campus) which is based (loosely) on the Hunchback of Notre Dame and that even has the alternate title The Hunchback of UCLA.
This comic came out in 1993, so maybe Larson was inspired by the movie?
detective Isaac Hanson, who found Backeberg, said he was able to locate her through her sister’s Ancestry.com account.
“That was pretty key in locating death records, census reports, all kinds of data,” Hanson told the news station, adding: “Ultimately, we came up with an address
I hate that about those genealogy sites: Someone else can give up your privacy for you. I found myself on one with a whole bunch of private info because some relative thought it was cool to put the whole family out there. They included kids, everyone’s birthdays, maiden names, addresses, the whole shebang. All completely public for anyone to search for, without asking anyone if it was okay with them.
Then bringing it to a blue mailbox might be your best option.
Can you leave sticking out of the slot?
That’s the point of the post-it note. So they see it.
I’ve done it before at an apartment, though admittedly it was many many moons ago.
The sticky note was just to be a flag, not the message.
If you don’t want to take it to a mailbox, you can put it back in your own mailbox with the “return to sender - no longer at this address” on it. The mail carrier can pick it up when they deliver your mail next. If they seem to miss it, you can try putting a bright post-it note on it to make it stand out.
That all being said, it’s probably bad optics for Carney right now. It’s probably in his interest to delay this until after the election.
Absolutely. The Chinese ambassador pretty much said that too by saying that Carney’s current stance is a posture for election… Basically giving Carney room to flip the other way after the election without China holding a grudge. At least, that’s how I read it.
Yes, I absolutely think we should prioritize deals with the EU. I think this is the perfect time for it. I worry that it won’t be enough to make up for the US though and we’ll need other deals to make up the shortfall.
This really feels like a huge opportunity for Canada. But I don’t know enough on this to argue for making a deal with China - or against it. This is all just spit balling and I’m ready to be set straight!
I mean I know Carney has come out against China on a number of things, calling them a geopolitical and foreign interference threat. I think he also mentioned their human rights record in the past. Does that change if we increase or decrease trade with them? I genuinely don’t know. Can we exert more influence over China if we work with them? Can they do the same to us? The timing of this particular announcement is interesting. It seems like they find PP more desirable than Carney…
When you look at progress in tech, science and space, China really looks to have a lot of momentum and is poised to take over leadership in these areas. I would hate for Canada to be left in the dust because we hitched ourselves too tightly to a collapsing America.
Maybe we can make an automotive deal with China that helps our own industry? Diversifying away from the US seems interesting.
It would certainly piss off Trump if we made some big trade deals with China.
Not if it’s a Pixel 6 Pro!
“Try the new, exciting, MMR flavour ice cream!”
There was a Biff question on Jeopardy yesterday (I think, I’m in a weird time zone), and my first thought was the response would be “what is Trum- er Biff! I mean Biff!”
Thanks for clarifying your view - I get where you’re coming from now. I’m not conflating society and government so much as recognizing that in most real-world societies, the line between the two isn’t always so clean. Governments often represent collective values, even imperfectly, and they’re the mechanism through which rights are codified and enforced.
You might believe in total free speech, but I’d argue that most societies - even the most liberal democracies - accept some limits to protect others’ rights or prevent harm. If speech truly had zero consequences beyond social disapproval, that could leave vulnerable groups exposed to abuse. So, societies have a right to draw those lines differently, based on their own values.
Anyways, since you can’t be civil (i.e. you’re a fucking asshole who can’t argue without ad hominem attacks), I’m done communicating with you.
Also also, if you were Canadian, what trouble could you possibly get in being critical of Thailand? You’re either an insane coward or a liar for that one
Perhaps I’m not in Canada right now. Maybe think outside your tiny little box and stop being a numb skull (see, I can insult you, too.)
Do you agree with any limits on free speech in a society?
I won’t give my opinion because I don’t want it to lead to me getting in any kind of trouble, if that makes you feel any better.
But in any case, my point is you can’t project your beliefs onto others.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatchewan/wildfire-air-ronge-evacuation-pelican-narrows-1.7556430
About 15,000 have fled Saskatchewan wildfires and more coming: Premier Moe