Too difficult. Much easier to send someone out of orbit than into the sun.

You gotta give me your yoga instructor because that’s a big stretch!

Relevant comment chain: https://programming.dev/comment/12187727

Yessss this program is amazing. One of the few things I’ve donated to.

I love love love that Fossil is a single executable.

All in all, the version control wars have ended and git has won. Mercurial is another one I sort of wanna try just to see what it’s like.

Re: rebasing, I think squashing / rebasing (in place of merging) is bad but I am also one of the few people I know who tries to make a good history with good commit messages prior to opening a pull request by using interactive rebasing. (This topic is confusing to talk about because I have to say “I don’t rebase, instead o rebase” which can be confusing.)

I think I looked into this before and it lacked a feature, but I don’t remember what it was. I might be getting it mixed up with another tool. There were a lot of tools that almost worked but were focused on making books with ordered pages rather than a tree. I think gitbook was one.

For folks interested in following in my footsteps, eleventy didn’t fit because it couldn’t convert relative links to markdown files to relative HTML links to the HTML files (out of the box, probably possible with plugins).

This just feels like such an obvious thing there would be a tool for but I can’t find one. Even most editors that render Markdown as a preview can do this out of the box.

My dream is something that can take a stack of markdown files with relative links and generate a static site from them. This is embarrassingly difficult. Right now I think that the GitHub Pages Ruby Gem is the best way but it has too many assumptions about being in a GitHub repository to work. Vanilla Jekyll is nice but I don’t want to deal with a bunch of configs to get the experience I want.

I have my workspace in Google drive synced folder and it’s worked fine.

Ew. They don’t even try to load lol.

From another comment on this thread: https://github.com/jgraph/drawio/discussions/4623

Source available*

After dealing with tcl errors trying to test sqlite, I feel I’ve never seen a more scathing criticism of fossil.

Fossil https://fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/server/

So you can access your router’s config page without blasting your password in plaintext or getting certificate warnings. It’s an optional feature.

You cannot buy .internal domains. That’s my point.

People can talk about whatever they want whenever they want. The discussion naturally went to the challenges of getting non-self-signed certificates for this new TLD. That’s all.

How do you propose to get LetsEncrypt to offer you a certificate for a domain name you do not and cannot control?

My Asus router is actually able to get a certificate and use DDNS which is really interesting.

They’re differentiating between belief in a god and worship of a god.

Also, put a backslash before asterisks and it won’t make italics.

Every time I get stuck on something confusing I’m a README and figure it out I try to submit a patch that makes it more explicit.