Yeah for planes I’m not worried about how to use the door, I’m worried about how I get from 20 000+ feet to ground level, safely.

For trains and buses it’d be more about hiking out from the middle of nowhere.

Either case I’m not actually worried, just saying that the logic of “trust no one but yourself” is flawed.

Remind me never to get on an airplane or train.

Buses questionable.

Oh well guess I’ll continue using audiobookshelf.

You missed. Your target is over here: https://lemmy.world/post/44020543

Saving a click: “the same landlord” is Asif Aziz, some billionaire asshole in the Middle East.

And we also grow soybeans to feed to Chinese farm animals

Well, not any more.

It depends on what is meant by “destroy”. I interpret it as “destroy in its current form”, not “erase from the map”.

Destroy in the way that Nazi Germany was destroyed, or the British Empire was destroyed. The people and places still exist, but are structured differently.

Not in the way that Palestine is being destroyed now where there is literally bare emptiness where the people were.

“Immigration and Customs Enforcement” —abbreviated as “ICE” — is the organization that he supports. He’s not in favor of immigration, he’s in favor of the organization that traditionally enforces immigration laws, in other words anti-immigration.

Also worth noting that this organization’s mission has been skewed from simply enforcing the laws into “kidnapping people with tan skin or or who have an accent” and generally being a modern version of the Nazi “brownshirts”. So that is what he is supporting.

Full Metal Jacket.

I’m certainly not saying that the people under attack should be obligated to prove it in any way.

Just curious if the AI is in any way accurate or if it ends up just being generic naked bodies with a recognizable face. I’m guessing it’s the latter.

It’s disgusting yes but I don’t see it as any different than the magazine-style clipping cut-and-paste. More expensive and worse for the environment I suppose,…

But none of the people involved in creating it care if it’s real, just as before, and the realism isn’t even the point. So it’s functionally identical.

You don’t need to tell that it’s real vs AI. If the objective is to create a picture of the person naked all you do is go “yeah that’s not what I like like naked” and move on.

There is no way other than random chance that the AI would know about a random scar, mole, or a million other details it will get wrong. And I expect that it will have that plasticky airbrushed look, but AI is getting better about that so maybe not.

Could be.

I don’t doubt that they do really look like naked people, but i doubt they actually look like the person they are supposed to portray.

In which case… back to square one, you’re putting someone’s head on the body of a different naked person.

I doubt it.

Someone should do side-by-side AI slop fake nudes compared to the real thing. I bet they get it wrong as much as they do everything else, i.e. constantly.

Why is this any scarier than pasting a photo of their head on a clipping from a porn magazine?

What about the rest of them?

Aren’t they all linked to the Muskrat?

Car crash in front of my house. Someone pulled out without seeing a car coming and got T-boned.

I wonder if Patty made it.

Or do that and cite the decades of work and investment it takes to build that industry.